Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T14:26:49Z
dc.date.available2020-04-15T14:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-08
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202004061142
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11513
dc.descriptionGedruckte Ausgabe im Verlag kassel university press erschienen.ger
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectchemical feed additiveseng
dc.subjectnutrient utilisationeng
dc.subjectphyto-additiveseng
dc.subjectpoultryeng
dc.subjectstage of maturityeng
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleInfluence of stage of ripening and dietary concentration of Noni (Morinda citrifolia L.) powder on broiler performanceeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractPhyto-additives in poultry diets enhance growth, feed eciency and product quality and minimise the possible risk of residues from chemical additives. There are reports on the use of noni (Morinda citrifolia) fruit powder as phytoadditive in poultry diets but information on the eect of fruit ripening is scanty. Hence, this study compared the eect of unripe and ripe noni fruit owder on broiler performance. A control diet without and 4 diets containing two levels (0.25 and 0.5 %) unripe and ripe fruit powder were fed to 5 replicates containing 6 Cobb500 broilers in a completely randomized design. Data collection was on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass and organ measurements. In the starter (8–21 d), feed intake (FI) reduced on 0.5% unripe powder (p < 0:05) but did not dier between the control and 0.25% ripe powder (p > 0:05). Nitrogen retention reduced on 0.25% unripe powder compared to the control and the ripe powder (p < 0:05). Poorer dressing percentage was observed on 0.5%ripe powder (p < 0:05). Breast weight was increased and thigh weight reduced on 0.25% ripe and 0.5% unripe powder (p < 0:05). In conclusion, up to 0.5% noni, fruit powder has no beneficial eect on broiler growth, but the stage of ripening may influences protein digestibility and dressing percentage. We recommend more research into feed processing and diet composition.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorLal, Priya Pritika
dcterms.creatorDiarra, Siaka Seriba
dcterms.creatorAmosa, Falaniko
dcterms.creatorDevi, Ashika
dc.subject.swdFutterzusatzger
dc.subject.swdNährstoffversorgungger
dc.subject.swdGeflügelger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifierISSN 2363-6033
dcterms.source.issueNo. 1
dcterms.source.journalJournal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS)eng
dcterms.source.pageinfo57-62
dcterms.source.volumeVol. 121
kup.iskupfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International