Öffnen
Datum
2020-07-21Autor
Wendt, Leon P.Wright, Aidan G. C.Pilkonis, Paul A.Woods, William C.Denissen, Jaap J. A.Kühnel, AnjaZimmermann, JohannesMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Indicators of Affect Dynamics: Structure, Reliability, and Personality Correlates
Zusammenfassung
Researchers are increasingly interested in the affect dynamics of individuals for describing and explaining personality and psychopathology. Recently, the incremental validity of more complex indicators of affect dynamics (IADs; e.g. autoregression) has been called into question (Dejonckheere et al., 2019), with evidence accumulating that these might convey little unique information beyond mean level and general variability of emotions. Our study extends the evidence for the construct validity of IADs by investigating their redundancy and uniqueness, split‐half reliability based on indices from odd‐numbered and even‐numbered days, and association with big five personality traits. We used three diverse samples that assessed daily and momentary emotions, including community participants, individuals with personality pathology, and their significant others (total N = 1192, total number of occasions = 51 278). Mean and variability of affects had high reliability and distinct nomological patterns to big five personality traits. In contrast, more complex IADs exhibited substantial redundancies with mean level and general variability of emotions. When partialing out these redundancies by using residual variables, some of the more complex IADs had acceptable reliability, but only a few of these showed incremental associations with big five personality traits, indicating that IADs have limited validity using the current assessment practices.
Zitierform
In: European Journal of Personality Volume 34 / Issue 6 (2020-07-21) , S. 1060-1072 ; EISSN 1099-0984Förderhinweis
Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALZitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202012222884,
author={Wendt, Leon P. and Wright, Aidan G. C. and Pilkonis, Paul A. and Woods, William C. and Denissen, Jaap J. A. and Kühnel, Anja and Zimmermann, Johannes},
title={Indicators of Affect Dynamics: Structure, Reliability, and Personality Correlates},
journal={European Journal of Personality},
year={2020}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2020$n2020 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12379 3000 Wendt, Leon P. 3010 Wright, Aidan G. C. 3010 Pilkonis, Paul A. 3010 Woods, William C. 3010 Denissen, Jaap J. A. 3010 Kühnel, Anja 3010 Zimmermann, Johannes 4000 Indicators of Affect Dynamics: Structure, Reliability, and Personality Correlates / Wendt, Leon P. 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12379=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Affekt}} 5550 {{Dynamik}} 5550 {{Zuverlässigkeit}} 5550 {{Struktur}} 5550 {{Persönlichkeitsfaktor}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12379
2020-12-23T14:29:53Z 2020-12-23T14:29:53Z 2020-07-21 doi:10.17170/kobra-202012222884 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12379 Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ affect dynamics reliability residual variables structure personality traits 150 Indicators of Affect Dynamics: Structure, Reliability, and Personality Correlates Aufsatz Researchers are increasingly interested in the affect dynamics of individuals for describing and explaining personality and psychopathology. Recently, the incremental validity of more complex indicators of affect dynamics (IADs; e.g. autoregression) has been called into question (Dejonckheere et al., 2019), with evidence accumulating that these might convey little unique information beyond mean level and general variability of emotions. Our study extends the evidence for the construct validity of IADs by investigating their redundancy and uniqueness, split‐half reliability based on indices from odd‐numbered and even‐numbered days, and association with big five personality traits. We used three diverse samples that assessed daily and momentary emotions, including community participants, individuals with personality pathology, and their significant others (total N = 1192, total number of occasions = 51 278). Mean and variability of affects had high reliability and distinct nomological patterns to big five personality traits. In contrast, more complex IADs exhibited substantial redundancies with mean level and general variability of emotions. When partialing out these redundancies by using residual variables, some of the more complex IADs had acceptable reliability, but only a few of these showed incremental associations with big five personality traits, indicating that IADs have limited validity using the current assessment practices. open access Wendt, Leon P. Wright, Aidan G. C. Pilkonis, Paul A. Woods, William C. Denissen, Jaap J. A. Kühnel, Anja Zimmermann, Johannes doi:10.1002/per.2277 Affekt Dynamik Zuverlässigkeit Struktur Persönlichkeitsfaktor publishedVersion EISSN 1099-0984 Issue 6 European Journal of Personality 1060-1072 Volume 34 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: