Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T16:40:19Z
dc.date.available2021-03-09T16:40:19Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-10
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202101273070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12601
dc.descriptionThis is a post-peer-review version of the article "Optimal energy supply structures for industrial food processing sites in different countries considering energy transitions". The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.062ger
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectenergy transitioneng
dc.subjectcombined heat and powereng
dc.subjectheat pumpeng
dc.subjectseparate conversioneng
dc.subjectgreenhouse gas emissionseng
dc.subjectprimary energy factoreng
dc.subject.ddc333
dc.subject.ddc600
dc.titleOptimal energy supply structures for industrial food processing sites in different countries considering energy transitionseng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractThis study focuses on analysing the most energy efficient utility system supply structure in terms of carbon emissions, primary energy efficiency and energy costs. In the German food processing industry, the state-of-the-art technologies in the utility supply structure are a gas fired steam boiler for steam generation and ammonia chillers for chilled water generation. Low investment costs and its durability are attractive for industrial production sites. But, given the ongoing energy transition to renewable energy, opportunities to reduce emissions will become increasingly important. There are other energy supply options, such as Combined Heat and Power and Heat Pumps, that need to compete against the conventional energy supply systems. In the short-term, countries with presently high electricity Grid Emissions Factors (GEF) such as Germany and the USA, the use of decentralised CHP results in savings of primary energy and emissions. This option is less attractive for countries with already low GEF such as Norway. It is also less attractive in the long-term for countries like Germany as the on-going energy transition towards renewables is anticipated to decrease the current GEF by 50% in 2030. In these cases of low GEF, HP solutions provide the lowest emissions and highest primary energy efficiency.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorPhilipp, Matthias
dcterms.creatorSchumm, Gregor
dcterms.creatorPeesel, Ron-Hendrik
dcterms.creatorWalmsley, Timothy Gordon
dcterms.creatorAtkins, Martin John
dcterms.creatorSchlosser, Florian
dcterms.creatorHesselbach, Jens
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.062
dc.subject.swdEnergiewendeger
dc.subject.swdKraft-Wärme-Kopplungger
dc.subject.swdWärmepumpeger
dc.subject.swdTreibhausgasger
dc.subject.swdPrimärenergieger
dc.subject.swdEnergieeffizienzger
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dcterms.source.identifierEISSN 0360-5442
dcterms.source.journalEnergyeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo112-123
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 146
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International