Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2021-06-29T10:19:10Z
dc.date.available2021-06-29T10:19:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-20
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202106294175
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12948
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectEcosystem serviceseng
dc.subjectephemeral streamseng
dc.subjectintermittent riverseng
dc.subjectnon-monetary valuationeng
dc.subjectparticipatory approacheng
dc.subjectsocio-cultural valuationeng
dc.subjecttemporal variabilityeng
dc.subjectwater managementeng
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc333
dc.titleDisentangling the complexity of socio-cultural values of temporary riverseng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractIn the last decade, an awareness towards temporary rivers has increased globally in response to drying climates and growing human demand for water. However, social perceptions of temporary rivers have rarely been incorporated in their science and management. In this study, we advance an understanding of the socio-cultural values of temporary rivers principally in a European context. We used an ecosystem services-based approach for a participatory and deliberative exercise with 16 researchers and managers. Our results point out to two important aspects of socio-cultural values in temporary rivers. First, cultural ecosystem services have high socio-cultural values and usually represent the interests of the less influential stakeholders in related conflicts. And second, the temporal and geographical variability of these types of rivers is key to understand their socio-cultural values. As an example, the low provision of freshwater in a long non-flowing phase is one of the reasons for its high value. The results above point to future research needs that deserve more attention like the study of tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services and interdisciplinary research and management. We finally acknowledge the need to conduct case study research to account for geographical variation and to include the multiple views of different stakeholder groups.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorJorda-Capdevila, Didac
dcterms.creatorIniesta-Arandia, Irene
dcterms.creatorQuintas-Soriano, Cristina
dcterms.creatorBasdeki, Aikaterini
dcterms.creatorCalleja, Eman J.
dcterms.creatorDeGirolamo, Anna Maria
dcterms.creatorGilvear, David
dcterms.creatorIlhéu, Maria
dcterms.creatorKriaučiūniene, Jūratė
dcterms.creatorLogar, Ivana
dcterms.creatorLoures, Luis
dcterms.creatorPadło, Tomasz
dc.relation.doidoi:10.080/26395916.1912186
dc.subject.swdWasserwirtschaftger
dc.subject.swdÖkosystemdienstleistungger
dc.subject.swdUmweltökonomieger
dc.subject.swdLeistungger
dc.subject.swdBewertungger
dc.subject.swdSoziologieger
dc.subject.swdFlussger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifierissn:2639-5916
dcterms.source.issueNo. 1
dcterms.source.journalEcosystems and peopleeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo235-247
dcterms.source.volumeVol. 17
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International