Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T07:57:57Z
dc.date.available2021-07-23T07:57:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-25
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202107234397
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13032
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectaccess theoryeng
dc.subjectevolutionary governance theoryeng
dc.subjectLahoreeng
dc.subjectlow-income housingeng
dc.subjectPakistaneng
dc.subjectplanningger
dc.subjectpowereng
dc.subjectpro-poor housingeng
dc.subjectsteeringeng
dc.subjecturban politicseng
dc.subject.ddc320
dc.titleMitigating pro-poor housing failures: Access theory and the politics of urban governanceeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractLooking at evolving urban governance and planning practices in the city of Lahore, Pakistan, the article aims to understand—from an Evolutionary Governance Theory perspective—to what extent these practices steer paths and modes of service provision and housing for low-income residents. With a focus on the endurance and transformations of urban governance practices and institutions, we first explore the influence of the changing development discourse and the impact it has had on the (re)configuration of urban governance and housing policies in Lahore. Second, drawing on extensive fieldwork and empirical data collected between 2012 and 2016, we highlight three vignettes depicting the development of different housing options for low-income residents in Lahore, i.e., a government-steered subsidised housing scheme, a privately developed ‘pro-poor’ settlement in the peri-urban fringe of the city, and residential colonies already—or in the process of being—regularised. By analysing the relationship between governance frameworks, the establishment of the three types of settlements and how residents manage to access housing and services there, we demonstrate how purposive deregulation in governance and policy generates a disconnect between urban normative frameworks (i.e., urban planning tools and pro-poor housing policies) and residents’ needs and everyday practices. We argue that this highly political process is not exclusively path-dependent but has also allowed the creation of liminal spaces based on agency and collective action strategies of low-income residents.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorMielke, Katja
dcterms.creatorCermeño, Helena
dc.relation.doidoi:10.17645/pag.v9i2.4113
dc.subject.swdPakistanger
dc.subject.swdPolitikger
dc.subject.swdStadtverwaltungger
dc.subject.swdSteuerungger
dc.subject.swdWohnraumger
dc.subject.swdArmutger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2183-2463
dcterms.source.issueIssue 2
dcterms.source.journalPolitics and governanceeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo439-450
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 9
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International