Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T15:35:23Z
dc.date.available2021-08-03T15:35:23Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202103253601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13069
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: "Mental rotation and the human body: Children's inflexible use of embodiment mirrors that of adults", which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12228. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsUrheberrechtlich geschützt
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectmental rotationeng
dc.subjectmental transformationeng
dc.subjectembodimenteng
dc.subjectimageryeng
dc.subjectmotor imageryeng
dc.subjectPiageteng
dc.subjectspatial skillseng
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.titleMental rotation and the human body: Children's inflexible use of embodiment mirrors that of adultseng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractAdults’ mental rotation performance with body‐like stimuli is enhanced if these stimuli are anatomically compatible with a human body, but decreased by anatomically incompatible stimuli. In this study, we investigated these effects for kindergartners and first‐graders: When asked to mentally rotate cube configurations attached with human body parts in an anatomically compatible way, allowing for the projection of a human body, children performed better than with pure cube combinations. By contrast, when body parts were attached in an anatomically incompatible way, disallowing the projection of a human body, children performed worse than with pure combinations. This experiment is of specific interest against the background of two different theoretical approaches concerning imagery and the motor system in development: One approach assumes an increasing integration of motor processes and imagery over time that enables older children and adults to requisition motor resources for imagery processes, while the other postulates that imagery stems from early sensorimotor processes in the first place, and is disentangled from it over time. The finding that children of the two age groups tested show exactly the same effects as adults when mentally rotating anatomically compatible and incompatible stimuli is interpreted in favour of the latter approach.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorKrüger, Markus
dcterms.creatorEbersbach, Mirjam
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1111/bjdp.12228
dc.relation.projectidDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). Grant Number: KR 4504/2‐1
dc.subject.swdRaumvorstellungger
dc.subject.swdKognitive Entwicklungger
dc.subject.swdKindger
dc.subject.swdMotorische Entwicklungger
dc.subject.swdExperimentelle Psychologieger
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2044-835X
dcterms.source.identifierissn:0261-510X
dcterms.source.issueIssue 3
dcterms.source.journalBritish Journal of Developmental Psychologyeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo418-437
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 36
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige