The Phantom of the ‘Responsible Consumer’: Unmasking the Intention–Action Gap with an Indirect Questioning Technique
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-04T13:26:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-04T13:26:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-12-03 | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.17170/kobra-202201215587 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13607 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Gefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | Namensnennung 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | socially desirable responding (SDR) | eng |
| dc.subject | consumer social responsibility (CnSR) | eng |
| dc.subject | sustainable consumption | eng |
| dc.subject | indirect questioning | eng |
| dc.subject | projective techniques | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 330 | |
| dc.title | The Phantom of the ‘Responsible Consumer’: Unmasking the Intention–Action Gap with an Indirect Questioning Technique | eng |
| dc.type | Aufsatz | |
| dcterms.abstract | The intention-action gap stands out in research on sustainable consumption for decades. The current research explores the role of socially desirable responding (SDR) in the appearance of this gap by utilising an indirect questioning technique. Two online experiments (n=306 and n=334) demonstrate, in line with most market surveys, that consumers present themselves as highly responsible when being assessed with the standard survey measurement approach (i.e., direct questioning). However, the responses of participants toward the exact same measures of consumers’ social responsibility perceptions and behavioural intentions heavily drop when applying an indirect questioning technique, indicating a substantial overstatement of consumers’ social responsibility perceptions in traditional market surveys. Furthermore, this study provides novel evidence regarding the validity and underlying mechanism of the indirect questioning technique, thereby alleviating long-lasting concerns about this method. Implications for the intention–action gap discussion and consumer ethics research are proposed. | eng |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | |
| dcterms.creator | Kilian, Sven | |
| dcterms.creator | Mann, Andreas | |
| dc.relation.doi | doi:10.3390/su132313394 | |
| dc.subject.swd | Verbraucherverhalten | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Soziale Verantwortung | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Nachhaltigkeit | ger |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
| dcterms.source.identifier | eissn: 2071-1050 | |
| dcterms.source.issue | Issue 23 | |
| dcterms.source.journal | Sustainability | eng |
| dcterms.source.volume | Volume 13 | |
| kup.iskup | false | |
| dcterms.source.articlenumber | 13394 |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource
Das Dokument erscheint in:
-
Artikel [1106]
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International