Aufsatz
The confidence-accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detection
Zusammenfassung
Previous research has produced mixed results on the question of whether confidence in ad hoc veracity judgments can be used as an indicator of judgment accuracy. These studies have used a variety of measures to analyze the confidence-accuracy relationship; however, they have rarely explicitly addressed why a particular measure was chosen and what its properties are. We theoretically and empirically examined previously used measures of metacognition in lie detection and report the results these measures yielded in re-analyses of 12 lie detection studies (total N = 2817 participants). Regardless of the measure, none of the studies found a confidence-accuracy relationship. Discrepancies between the measures are likely due to conceptual differences between them, emphasizing the importance of carefully selecting appropriate measures for the research question at hand. More work on the underlying processes of confidence judgments in lie detection is needed to improve the assessment of confidence and the selection of appropriate measures.
Zitierform
In: Applied Cognitive Psychology Volume 36 / Issue 3 (2022-04-26) , S. 673-684 ; eissn:1099-0720Förderhinweis
Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALZitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202206016283,
author={Volz, Sarah and Reinhard, Marc-André and Müller, Patrick},
title={The confidence-accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detection},
journal={Applied Cognitive Psychology},
year={2022}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2022$n2022 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14063 3000 Volz, Sarah 3010 Reinhard, Marc-André 3010 Müller, Patrick 4000 The confidence-accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detection / Volz, Sarah 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14063=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Lügendetektor}} 5550 {{Genauigkeit}} 5550 {{Metakognition}} 5550 {{Vertrauen}} 5550 {{Datenanalyse}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14063
2022-08-16T10:19:23Z 2022-08-16T10:19:23Z 2022-04-26 doi:10.17170/kobra-202206016283 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14063 Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL eng Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ accuracy calibration analysis confidence lie detection metacognition 150 The confidence-accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detection Aufsatz Previous research has produced mixed results on the question of whether confidence in ad hoc veracity judgments can be used as an indicator of judgment accuracy. These studies have used a variety of measures to analyze the confidence-accuracy relationship; however, they have rarely explicitly addressed why a particular measure was chosen and what its properties are. We theoretically and empirically examined previously used measures of metacognition in lie detection and report the results these measures yielded in re-analyses of 12 lie detection studies (total N = 2817 participants). Regardless of the measure, none of the studies found a confidence-accuracy relationship. Discrepancies between the measures are likely due to conceptual differences between them, emphasizing the importance of carefully selecting appropriate measures for the research question at hand. More work on the underlying processes of confidence judgments in lie detection is needed to improve the assessment of confidence and the selection of appropriate measures. open access Volz, Sarah Reinhard, Marc-André Müller, Patrick doi:10.1002/acp.3953 Lügendetektor Genauigkeit Metakognition Vertrauen Datenanalyse publishedVersion eissn:1099-0720 Issue 3 Applied Cognitive Psychology 673-684 Volume 36 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: