Zur Kurzanzeige

Comparison of linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine and artificial neural network in classifying Nigerian local turkeys based on plumage colours using biometric traits

dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T11:45:22Z
dc.date.available2022-10-21T11:45:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-18
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202210116964
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14208
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectclassificationeng
dc.subjectlavendereng
dc.subjecttestingeng
dc.subjecttrainingeng
dc.subjectmixed methodseng
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.subject.ddc590
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleComparison of linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine and artificial neural network in classifying Nigerian local turkeys based on plumage colours using biometric traitseng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractThe ability of linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN) models to differentiate biometric traits of Nigerian local turkeys was investigated in this study. The biometric traits (bodyweight, body length, breast girth, thigh length, shank length, keel length, wing length, and wingspan) in 200 (20-week-old) turkeys were measured. Seventy percent of the datasets were used to train the three models, with the remaining 30% being used to test their performance. All biometric traits were positively associated, with strong correlation values for several pairs of traits. In the testing dataset (Lavender = 30.0%, Black = 51.9% and White = 65.5%), the LDA had lower classification efficiency than in the training dataset (Lavender = 55.2%, Black = 43.4%, and White = 65.5%), indicating that the training model was not efficient in classification at the testing stage. In comparison to the training dataset (Lavender = 100.0%, Black = 87.3% and White = 98.2%), the SVM showed low classification efficiency for the testing dataset (Lavender = 70.0%, Black = 76.0% and White = 64.0%). However, in ANN, there was no variation in classification efficiency between the testing and training datasets (Lavender = 100.0%, Black = 100.0% and White =100.0%). In categorizing turkey plumage colours, the ANN model is the most powerful, followed by SVM. When the dataset's normality or multi-colinearity is broken, we propose using an ANN model rather than a standard model like the LDA for classification of biometric traits of Nigerian local turkeys.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorAdenaike, Adeyemi Sunday
dcterms.creatorOloye, Olanrewaju Similoluwa
dcterms.creatorEmmanuel, Happiness Oshioghieme
dcterms.creatorBello, Kazeem Olajide
dcterms.creatorIkeobi, Christian Ndubuisi Obiora
dc.subject.swdNigeriager
dc.subject.swdSupport-Vektor-Maschineger
dc.subject.swdTruthahnger
dc.subject.swdGefiederger
dc.subject.swdKlassifikationger
dc.subject.swdBiometrieger
dc.subject.swdMethodenmixger
dc.subject.swdNeuronales Netzger
dc.subject.swdMorphologie <Biologie>ger
dc.subject.swdMaschinelles Lernenger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2363-6033
dcterms.source.issueNo. 2
dcterms.source.journalJournal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS)eng
dcterms.source.pageinfo197-204
dcterms.source.volumeVol. 123
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Name:
JARTSVol123No2S197.pdf
Größe:
188.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Öffnen
Thumbnail
Name:
license_rdf
Größe:
908Bytes
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Öffnen

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International