Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T13:36:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T13:36:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-25
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202210267038
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14217
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kasselger
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectheterogeneous neighbourhoodseng
dc.subjectProSHAREeng
dc.subjectR-Urbaneng
dc.subjectsituated knowledgeseng
dc.subjectspatial knowledgeeng
dc.subjecttranslocal learningeng
dc.subjecturban commonseng
dc.subjecturban living labeng
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc720
dc.titleSharing and Space‐Commoning Knowledge Through Urban Living Labs Across Different European Citieseng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractWhile the growing commodification of housing and public spaces in European cities is producing urban inequalities affecting mostly migrant and vulnerable populations, there are also manifold small-scale neighbourhood-based collaborative processes that seek to co-produce shared urban resources and contribute to more resilient urban developments. As part of the ProSHARE research project that investigates conditions in which sharing takes place and can be expanded to less-represented populations, we focus here on sharing and space-commoning practices within urban living labs. Considered multi-stakeholders sites for innovation, testing, and learning with a strong urban transformative potential, urban living labs have received increasing academic attention in recent years. However, questions related to whether and how labs facilitate processes of exchange and negotiation of knowledge claims and generate spatial knowledge remain largely unexplored. We address this gap by looking at the role urban living labs play in the regeneration of neighbourhoods, asking how sharing and space-commoning practices generate situated spatial knowledge(s) that can be used in planning processes, and what type of settings and methods can facilitate such processes. These questions are addressed in the context of four ProSHARE-Labs located in Berlin, Paris (Bagneux), London, and Vienna, drawing on a cross-case analysis of the functioning of these hubs, the research methods applied in each context, and on the translocal learning and possibilities for upscaling resulting from these parallel experiences.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorPetrescu, Doina
dcterms.creatorCermeño, Helena
dcterms.creatorKeller, Carsten
dcterms.creatorMoujan, Carola
dcterms.creatorBelfield, Andrew
dcterms.creatorKoch, Florian
dcterms.creatorGoff, Denise
dcterms.creatorSchalk, Meike
dcterms.creatorBernhardt, Floris
dc.relation.doidoi:10.17645/up.v7i3.5402
dc.subject.swdEuropager
dc.subject.swdRäumliches Wissenger
dc.subject.swdErkenntnistheorieger
dc.subject.swdGemeinwohlger
dc.subject.swdStadtentwicklungger
dc.subject.swdStadtplanungger
dc.subject.swdGemeineigentumger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2183-7635
dcterms.source.issueNo 3
dcterms.source.journalUrban Planningeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo254–273
dcterms.source.volumeVol 7
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International