Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T11:42:22Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T11:42:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-11
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202307268490
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14929
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectfemale leadershipeng
dc.subjectworkplace bullyingeng
dc.subjectgender stereotypeseng
dc.subjectcommunality deficiteng
dc.subjectbacklasheng
dc.subjectcredibility judgmentseng
dc.subjectmoral outrageeng
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.titleMean girls, queen bees and iron maidens? Female leadership and accusations of workplace bullyingeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractWe examined whether female leaders would be evaluated less favorably compared to male leaders regarding workplace bullying. Previous research has demonstrated that women violating prescriptive gender norms of communality experience backlash, and that female leaders are stereotyped of having a communality deficit. Building on that, we hypothesized (1) more moral outrage against and (2) more intentions to punish a female leader compared to a male leader. We further hypothesized (3) the accusations of workplace bullying against a female leader were going to be judged as more accurate than against a male leader. Further, defendants that stereotypically fit to the crime they are accused of were found to be judged guilty more often. So, we assumed, (4) a suspected bully that is a female leader was going to be judged as less credible, while (2) the suspected victim of a female leader bully was going to be judged as more credible compared to a male leader. Participants (N = 202) read a workplace bullying scenario with a female employee accusing either a female or a male leader of bullying. No effect of gender of suspected bully was found for moral outrage measures, punishment intention judgments, and credibility judgments. Contrary to our predictions, participants found the accusations against the male leader significantly more accurate than against the female leader. Gender and sex-role scores of participants were found to be linked to judgments. Implications for future research are discussed.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorStolz, Celina
dcterms.creatorReinhard, Marc-André
dcterms.creatorEnde, Luise
dcterms.extent249–264
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1515/psych-2022-0127
dc.subject.swdWeibliche Führungskraftger
dc.subject.swdMobbingger
dc.subject.swdArbeitsweltger
dc.subject.swdMoralger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2543-8883
dcterms.source.issueHeft 1
dcterms.source.journalOpen Psychologyeng
dcterms.source.volumeBand 4
kup.iskupfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung 4.0 International