Datum
2023-03-23Autor
Torralba, MarioNishi, MaikoCebrán-Piqueras, Miguel A.Quintas-Soriano, CristinaGarcía-Martin, MaríaPlieninger, TobiasSchlagwort
500 Naturwissenschaften 710 Landschaftsgestaltung, Raumplanung LandschaftNachhaltigkeitLandschaftsplanungQ-TechnikLandschaftspflegeMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes
Zusammenfassung
Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI), as well as the motivations for employing them. Our analysis revealed that all landscape approaches pursued very similar goals, namely to ensure that local communities as landscape stewards have the capacity to preserve context-specific values in the face of socio-economic and environmental changes. The tools for reaching such goals are built upon people and nature feedback dynamics that crystalize in rich biodiversity and local ecological knowledge. However, our analysis also showed that the means to reach those goals differed depending on many contextual factors, such as the dominant ecosystems and socio-economic activities in the landscape, the constellation of actors or the most relevant drivers of change affecting the social–ecological system. In particular, we identified four distinct lenses in which landscapes approaches are applied in practice to landscape sustainability: (1) for the preservation of natural values, (2) for the preservation of socio-cultural values, (3) for the promotion of social justice and participatory governance, and (4) for securing food security and local livelihoods. Our results showed an association between the choice of a lens and the value types motivating the use of a landscape approach. Relational values were associated with a focus on landscape conservation and safeguard of social–ecological values. Our study highlights the relevant and beneficial role of landscape approaches as a boundary concept and emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary and participatory methods within landscape research and practice to navigate the context-specific options for implementation of landscape approaches.
Zitierform
In: Sustainability Science Volume 18 / Issue 4 (2023-03-23) , S. 1893-1906 ; eissn:1862-4057Förderhinweis
Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALZitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202308058581,
author={Torralba, Mario and Nishi, Maiko and Cebrán-Piqueras, Miguel A. and Quintas-Soriano, Cristina and García-Martin, María and Plieninger, Tobias},
title={Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes},
journal={Sustainability Science},
year={2023}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2023$n2023 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14984 3000 Torralba, Mario 3010 Nishi, Maiko 3010 Cebrán-Piqueras, Miguel A. 3010 Quintas-Soriano, Cristina 3010 García-Martin, María 3010 Plieninger, Tobias 4000 Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes / Torralba, Mario 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14984=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Landschaft}} 5550 {{Nachhaltigkeit}} 5550 {{Landschaftsplanung}} 5550 {{Q-Technik}} 5550 {{Landschaftspflege}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14984
2023-08-14T11:13:12Z 2023-08-14T11:13:12Z 2023-03-23 doi:10.17170/kobra-202308058581 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14984 Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ landscape sustainability SEPLS q-sorts integrated landscape management 500 710 Disentangling the practice of landscape approaches: a Q-method analysis on experiences in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes Aufsatz Landscape approaches are gaining momentum in both scientific and policy agendas. However, landscape approaches comprise a multitude of concepts, approaches and principles, which are in part similar, in some parts different or even contradictory. In this paper, we used a Q-method questionnaire to explore how landscape approaches are understood and employed in 45 case studies of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes derived from the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI), as well as the motivations for employing them. Our analysis revealed that all landscape approaches pursued very similar goals, namely to ensure that local communities as landscape stewards have the capacity to preserve context-specific values in the face of socio-economic and environmental changes. The tools for reaching such goals are built upon people and nature feedback dynamics that crystalize in rich biodiversity and local ecological knowledge. However, our analysis also showed that the means to reach those goals differed depending on many contextual factors, such as the dominant ecosystems and socio-economic activities in the landscape, the constellation of actors or the most relevant drivers of change affecting the social–ecological system. In particular, we identified four distinct lenses in which landscapes approaches are applied in practice to landscape sustainability: (1) for the preservation of natural values, (2) for the preservation of socio-cultural values, (3) for the promotion of social justice and participatory governance, and (4) for securing food security and local livelihoods. Our results showed an association between the choice of a lens and the value types motivating the use of a landscape approach. Relational values were associated with a focus on landscape conservation and safeguard of social–ecological values. Our study highlights the relevant and beneficial role of landscape approaches as a boundary concept and emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary and participatory methods within landscape research and practice to navigate the context-specific options for implementation of landscape approaches. open access Torralba, Mario Nishi, Maiko Cebrán-Piqueras, Miguel A. Quintas-Soriano, Cristina García-Martin, María Plieninger, Tobias doi:10.1007/s11625-023-01307-2 Landschaft Nachhaltigkeit Landschaftsplanung Q-Technik Landschaftspflege publishedVersion eissn:1862-4057 Issue 4 Sustainability Science 1893-1906 Volume 18 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: