Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T09:02:21Z
dc.date.available2023-08-21T09:02:21Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-27
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202308058579ger
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15008
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALger
dc.language.isoengger
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectjudgementdetection of deceptionger
dc.subjectlay judgementger
dc.subjectlie detectionger
dc.subjectrelationship qualityger
dc.subjectuncertaintyger
dc.subjectverbal communicationger
dc.subject.ddc150ger
dc.subject.ddc300ger
dc.titleIs the uncertain self good at detecting lies? The influence of personal uncertainty on deception detectionger
dc.typeAufsatzger
dcterms.abstractFive experiments (total number of judging participants = 1309, four different kinds of stimulus materials with a total of 464 messages, total number of judgements = 19,634) investigated the influence of personal uncertainty on the process of lie detection in social relationships. Building on and extending basic assumptions of uncertainty management models, we reasoned that uncertainty about themselves motivates people to evaluate the quality of their relationships. A crucial aspect of the quality of relationships with other people is the truthfulness with which they communicate verbally with you and anyone else. We proposed that if these assumptions are valid, reminding people of their personal uncertainties should lead them to use valid verbal cues in veracity judgements more. This enhanced usage of valid verbal cues should result in better accuracy in deception detection. An internal meta-analysis of the five experiments reveals only a small, not significant, overall effect of uncertainty salience on detection accuracy with larger effect sizes for experiments conducted in the laboratory than for those conducted online. Hence, if personal uncertainty plays a role in the process of deception detection, it seems to be subject to moderators such as methodological or motivational factors.ger
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessger
dcterms.creatorReinhard, Marc-André
dcterms.creatorVolz, Sarah
dcterms.creatorVan den Bos, Kees
dcterms.creatorMüller, Patrick A.
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1002/ejsp.2948
dc.relation.projectidRE2218/4-1ger
dc.subject.swdTäuschungger
dc.subject.swdLügeger
dc.subject.swdErkennenger
dc.subject.swdBeziehungger
dc.subject.swdUnsicherheitger
dc.subject.swdNichtverbale Kommunikationger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionger
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:1099-0992ger
dcterms.source.issueIssue 5ger
dcterms.source.journalEuropean Journal of Social Psychologyger
dcterms.source.pageinfo984-1003ger
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 53ger
kup.iskupfalseger


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International