Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T12:26:09Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T12:26:09Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202402109556
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15540
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectActor-Network Theoryeng
dc.subjectCriminologyeng
dc.subjectFinancializationeng
dc.subjectElder Financial Exploitationeng
dc.subjectFinancial Regulationeng
dc.subjectWar on Drugseng
dc.subjectPost-structuralismeng
dc.subjectSuspicious Activityeng
dc.subjectRisk Managementeng
dc.subjectAuditeng
dc.subjectWhite Collar Crimeeng
dc.subjectAnti-Money Launderingeng
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc320
dc.titleReporting Powereng
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractAn eclectic genealogy (Foucault, 1977) that reconstructs the previous understanding and emergence of a ‘taken for granted’ global practice: the practice of suspicious activity reporting. A governance practice whereby financial institutions worldwide document and report the conduct of consumers deemed suspicious. At the center of this practice is a material artefact, a multipage fillable form called the Suspicious Activity Report. Following Actor-Network Theory (Latour, 1987), the form also serves as the centerpiece of the dissertation. Beginning in the 1970s and stretching into the 1990s, the dissertation shows how previous iterations of the same form were used by financial institutions and regulatory agencies in the United States to document the misconduct of financial institutions and their employees. The research shows that while the physical form itself remained largely the same, the momentous change was the relationships between actors: who held the power to deem dangerous whom, and what type of conduct was being documented. While much has been written on the topic, this contribution represents the first to document empirically the neglected connection to former iterations of the form, the network and practice of reporting that previously surveilled the conduct of the financial industry rather than the everyday citizen, and finally, the powerful social groups that instigated and benefited from this transformation (Gramsci, 1971). It is also a work in the tradition of critical criminology that looks at white-collar and corporate crime in lieu of wars on drugs or terrorism. The research represents a counterpoint and also empirical manifestation of the shifting emphasis in both crime control and crime control studies: from white-collar misconduct to the everyday activity of citizens and consumers.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorBasham, James
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-30
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-30
dcterms.extentix, 249, XVII Seiten
dc.contributor.corporatenameKassel, Universität Kassel, Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften
dc.contributor.refereeScherrer, Christoph (Prof. Dr.)
dc.contributor.refereeKronauer, Martin (Prof. Dr.)
dc.subject.swdKriminologieger
dc.subject.swdWirtschaftskriminalitätger
dc.subject.swdGeldwäscheger
dc.subject.swdRisikomanagementger
dc.subject.swdRechnungsprüfungger
dc.title.subtitleThe Artefacts of Financial Misconduct and Suspicious Activityeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
kup.iskupfalse
ubks.epflichttrue


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International