Datum
2023-12-30Metadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Is the perceptual disfluency effect moderated by working memory capacity? Direct replication of Lehmann et al. (2016)
Zusammenfassung
According to an aptitude-treatment interaction experiment (Lehmann et al., Metacognition and Learning, 11, 89–105, 2016, N = 47, published in Metacognition and Learning), perceptually disfluent texts facilitated retention and comprehension performance (but not transfer performance) only for learners with higher working memory capacity (WMC). No effects of WMC for a fluent text were found (albeit theoretically, fluency may be more advantageous for learners with lower WMC). The findings of our (pre-registered) direct replication (supervised online sample of N = 96) show a substantial deviation from the original results: In contrast to the interaction effect (disfluency and WMC) of the primary study, we obtained null results for disfluency, WMC, and their interaction for all learning outcomes. Our replication data are not indicative of WMC as a boundary condition moderating the disfluency effect on learning. We discuss discrepancies in the results of the primary study and our direct replication regarding particular methodological and analytical decisions, questioning the robustness and generalizability of Lehman et al.’s results beyond their primary study.
Zitierform
In: Metacognition and Learning Volume 19 / Issue 1 (2023-12-30) , S. 293 - 318 ; eissn:1556-1631Förderhinweis
Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALZitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202404109951,
author={Weissgerber, Sophia Christin and Terhorst, Denia Indah Permatasari and Rummer, Ralf},
title={Is the perceptual disfluency effect moderated by working memory capacity? Direct replication of Lehmann et al. (2016)},
journal={Metacognition and Learning},
year={2023}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2023$n2023 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15653 3000 Weissgerber, Sophia Christin 3010 Terhorst, Denia Indah Permatasari 3010 Rummer, Ralf 4000 Is the perceptual disfluency effect moderated by working memory capacity? Direct replication of Lehmann et al. (2016) / Weissgerber, Sophia Christin 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15653=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Arbeitsgedächnis}} 5550 {{Kapazität}} 5550 {{Replikation}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15653
2024-04-12T05:31:34Z 2024-04-12T05:31:34Z 2023-12-30 doi:10.17170/kobra-202404109951 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15653 Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Disfluency effect Learning with expository texts Working memory capacity (WMC) Direct replication Aptitude-treatment interaction (ATI) 370 Is the perceptual disfluency effect moderated by working memory capacity? Direct replication of Lehmann et al. (2016) Aufsatz According to an aptitude-treatment interaction experiment (Lehmann et al., Metacognition and Learning, 11, 89–105, 2016, N = 47, published in Metacognition and Learning), perceptually disfluent texts facilitated retention and comprehension performance (but not transfer performance) only for learners with higher working memory capacity (WMC). No effects of WMC for a fluent text were found (albeit theoretically, fluency may be more advantageous for learners with lower WMC). The findings of our (pre-registered) direct replication (supervised online sample of N = 96) show a substantial deviation from the original results: In contrast to the interaction effect (disfluency and WMC) of the primary study, we obtained null results for disfluency, WMC, and their interaction for all learning outcomes. Our replication data are not indicative of WMC as a boundary condition moderating the disfluency effect on learning. We discuss discrepancies in the results of the primary study and our direct replication regarding particular methodological and analytical decisions, questioning the robustness and generalizability of Lehman et al.’s results beyond their primary study. open access Weissgerber, Sophia Christin Terhorst, Denia Indah Permatasari Rummer, Ralf doi:10.1007/s11409-023-09366-7 Arbeitsgedächnis Kapazität Replikation publishedVersion eissn:1556-1631 Issue 1 Metacognition and Learning 293 - 318 Volume 19 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: