dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-08T12:18:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-08T12:18:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06-25 | |
dc.identifier | doi:10.17170/kobra-2024080810648 | ger |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15960 | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL | ger |
dc.language.iso | eng | ger |
dc.rights | Namensnennung 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Tribalism | ger |
dc.subject | Science of science | ger |
dc.subject | Network analysis | ger |
dc.subject | Co-citation analysis | ger |
dc.subject | Management and Organizational Studies | ger |
dc.subject | Multiple center–periphery analysis | ger |
dc.subject.ddc | 370 | ger |
dc.title | Is Management and Organizational Studies divided into (micro‑)tribes? | ger |
dc.type | Aufsatz | ger |
dcterms.abstract | Many claims have been made in the past that Management and Organization Studies (MOS) is becoming increasingly fragmented, and that this fragmentation is causing it to drift into self-reference and irrelevance. Despite the weight of this claim, it has not yet been subjected to a systematic empirical test. This paper addresses this research gap using the tribalization approach and diachronic co-citation analyses. Based on 22,430 papers published in 14 MOS journals between 1980 and 2019, we calculate local and global centrality measures and the flow of cited articles between co-citation communities over time. In addition, we use a node-removal strategy to test whether only ritualized citations ensure MOS cohesion. Rather than tribalization, our results suggest a center–periphery structure. Furthermore, more peripheral papers are integrated into the central co-citation communities, but the lion’s share of the flow of cited papers occurs over time to only a small number of large clusters. An increase of fragmentation and crowding-out of smaller clusters in MOS in seen in the polycentrically organized core 2014–2019. | ger |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | ger |
dcterms.creator | Wieczorek, Oliver | |
dcterms.creator | Hallonsten, Olof | |
dcterms.creator | Åström, Fredrik | |
dc.relation.doi | doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05013-3 | |
dc.subject.swd | Wissenschaft | ger |
dc.subject.swd | Zitatenanalyse | ger |
dc.subject.swd | Netzwerkanalyse | ger |
dc.subject.swd | Tribalismus | ger |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | ger |
dcterms.source.identifier | eissn:1588-2861 | ger |
dcterms.source.journal | Scientometrics | ger |
dcterms.source.pageinfo | 3871 - 3995 | ger |
dcterms.source.volume | Volume 129 | ger |
kup.iskup | false | ger |