Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T12:18:34Z
dc.date.available2024-08-08T12:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-25
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-2024080810648ger
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15960
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALger
dc.language.isoengger
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectTribalismger
dc.subjectScience of scienceger
dc.subjectNetwork analysisger
dc.subjectCo-citation analysisger
dc.subjectManagement and Organizational Studiesger
dc.subjectMultiple center–periphery analysisger
dc.subject.ddc370ger
dc.titleIs Management and Organizational Studies divided into (micro‑)tribes?ger
dc.typeAufsatzger
dcterms.abstractMany claims have been made in the past that Management and Organization Studies (MOS) is becoming increasingly fragmented, and that this fragmentation is causing it to drift into self-reference and irrelevance. Despite the weight of this claim, it has not yet been subjected to a systematic empirical test. This paper addresses this research gap using the tribalization approach and diachronic co-citation analyses. Based on 22,430 papers published in 14 MOS journals between 1980 and 2019, we calculate local and global centrality measures and the flow of cited articles between co-citation communities over time. In addition, we use a node-removal strategy to test whether only ritualized citations ensure MOS cohesion. Rather than tribalization, our results suggest a center–periphery structure. Furthermore, more peripheral papers are integrated into the central co-citation communities, but the lion’s share of the flow of cited papers occurs over time to only a small number of large clusters. An increase of fragmentation and crowding-out of smaller clusters in MOS in seen in the polycentrically organized core 2014–2019.ger
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessger
dcterms.creatorWieczorek, Oliver
dcterms.creatorHallonsten, Olof
dcterms.creatorÅström, Fredrik
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1007/s11192-024-05013-3
dc.subject.swdWissenschaftger
dc.subject.swdZitatenanalyseger
dc.subject.swdNetzwerkanalyseger
dc.subject.swdTribalismusger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionger
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:1588-2861ger
dcterms.source.journalScientometricsger
dcterms.source.pageinfo3871 - 3995ger
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 129ger
kup.iskupfalseger


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung 4.0 International