Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2009-01-15T13:38:02Z
dc.date.available2009-01-15T13:38:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-15T13:38:02Z
dc.identifier.uriurn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2009011525734
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2009011525734
dc.description.sponsorshipDAAD, CIDA-AIT Partnershipeng
dc.format.extent5351929 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsUrheberrechtlich geschützt
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectEnvironmental governanceeng
dc.subjectBottom-up planningeng
dc.subjectSolid waste managementeng
dc.subjectThailandeng
dc.subjectCommunity developmenteng
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.titleAn Inquiry of Changes in Environmental Governance by Community-driven Processeng
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractUrban environmental depletion has been a critical problem among industrialized-transformed societies, especially at the local level where administrative authorities’ capacity lags behind changes. Derived from governance concept, the idea of civil society inclusion is highlighted. Focusing on an agglomerated case study, Bang Plee Community in Thailand, this research investigates on a non-state sector, 201-Community organization, as an agent for changes to improve urban environments on solid waste collection. Two roles are contested: as an agent for neighborhood internal change and as an intermediary toward governance changes in state-civil society interaction. By employing longitudinal analysis via a project intervention as research experiment, the outcomes of both roles are detected portrayed in three spheres: state, state-civil society interaction, and civil society sphere. It discovers in the research regarding agglomerated context that as an internal changes for environmental betterment, 201-Community organization operation brings on waste reduction at the minimal level. Community-based organization as an agent for changes – despite capacity input it still limited in efficiency and effectiveness – can mobilize fruitfully only at the individual and network level of civil society sectors, while fails managing at the organizational level. The positive outcomes result by economic waste incentive associated with a limited-bonded group rather than the rise of awareness at large. As an intermediary agent for shared governance, the community-based organization cannot bring on mutual dialogue with state as much as cannot change the state’s operation arena of solid waste management. The findings confine the shared governance concept that it does not applicable in agglomerated locality as an effective outcome, both in terms of being instrumental toward civil society inclusion and being provocative of internal change. Shared environmental governance as summarized in this research can last merely a community development action. It distances significantly from civil society inclusion and empowerment. However, the research proposes that community-based environmental management and shared governance toward civil society inclusion in urban environmental improvement are still an expectable option and reachable if their factors and conditions of key success and failure are intersected with a particular context. Further studies demand more precise on scale, scope, and theses factors of environmental management operation operated by civil society sectors.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.alternativeA Bottom-up Approach on Solid Waste Management in Agglomerated Locality of Bangkokeng
dcterms.creatorUsavagovitwong, Nattawut
dc.contributor.corporatenameKassel, Universität, FB 06, Architektur, Stadtplanung, Landschaftsplanung
dc.contributor.refereeIpsen, Detlev (Prof. Dr.)
dc.contributor.refereeReuther, Iris (Prof. Dr.-Ing.)
dc.subject.swdThailandger
dc.subject.swdUmweltpolitikger
dc.subject.swdAbfallbeseitigungger
dc.date.examination2008-12-03


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record