Family as a redistributive principle of welfare states: An international comparison

dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T14:01:53Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T14:01:53Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-03
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen eines Open-Access-Transformationsvertrags mit dem Verlagger
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202302237534
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14511
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1177/09589287221115670
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectredistributive logicseng
dc.subjectwelfare state analysiseng
dc.subjectfamilyeng
dc.subjectEUROMODeng
dc.subjectintended redistributioneng
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.swdWohlfahrtsstaatger
dc.subject.swdAnalyseger
dc.subject.swdUmverteilungger
dc.subject.swdLogikger
dc.subject.swdFamilieger
dc.titleFamily as a redistributive principle of welfare states: An international comparisoneng
dc.typeAufsatz
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.abstractRedistribution is one of the main characteristics of the welfare state, and welfare state research has dealt intensely with various facets of it. The main focus in analysing redistribution is on the redistributive logics of welfare states in terms of work-related rights. Family as a major principle of welfare state redistribution, though, has hardly been included in these welfare state analyses. It has mainly been addressed by analysing outcome data or by analysing care as the most relevant characteristic of the family. We argue, though, that comparative welfare state analysis that addresses differences in welfare state intended redistribution needs to also include family as a redistributive principle to gain a more complete picture of societal redistribution. In this study, we are analysing the redistributive logics of welfare states in terms of family. We answer the question of how and in how far welfare states institutionalize family as a redistributive principle. We examine by means of the tax–benefit microsimulation model EUROMOD and its Hypothetical Household Tool (HHoT) welfare state regulations on family for three countries that are generally classed as different regime types. We differentiate between a great variety of family forms (referring to marital status, children and different forms of couples’ income distribution) to adequately test our theoretical assumptions. The findings show that family is a major redistributive principle of the welfare states analysed here and applied in different redistributive logics to the various family forms. This, then, results in an increase in income for certain family forms and a decrease in income for other family forms. These differences are not the result of one coherent set of regulations, but of an interplay of in part contradictory regulations that reflect a great variety of family-related redistributive logics within the single countries. Thus our study provides new insights into the redistributive logics of welfare states, and may contribute to the analysis of welfare state complexity in terms of theory, methodology and empirics.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorFrericks, Patricia
dcterms.creatorGurín, Martin
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:1461-7269
dcterms.source.issueIssue 1
dcterms.source.journalJournal of European Social Policyeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo52-66
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 33
kup.iskupfalse

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
09589287221115670.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections