From Food to Friends: Anatomy of a Social Change in Chile

The dissertation "From Food to Friends: Anatomy of a Social Change in Chile" examines the historical and sociocultural evolution of human-animal relationships in Chile, emphasizing how these interactions have profoundly shaped social and cultural structures. Rather than viewing this relationship through a linear narrative oriented toward progress, the study approaches it from the perspective of ruptures within modernization processes, highlighting discontinuities and tensions inherent in social change.

Beginning with the 18th century, the dissertation analyzes cattle rustling (abigeato) not merely as an economic crime but as a symbolic act of resistance against the socioeconomic inequalities imposed by colonial power structures. The detailed judicial examination of José Flores’ case elucidates the socio-normative tensions that shaped peripheral identities and reveals the complex interplay of social marginalization and resistance.

In the early 20th century, the research addresses the pivotal "Red Week" protests in Santiago, driven by rising meat prices. This episode is explored through a meticulous analysis of historical records, demonstrating how economic grievances catalyzed significant labor movements and political transformations, effectively challenging systemic inequalities.

The dissertation subsequently investigates the legislative paradoxes during Chile’s military dictatorship, specifically analyzing the enactment of ostensibly progressive animal welfare legislation amidst widespread human rights violations. Through the case of Ingrid Olderöck and her dog Volodia, the research explores deeper intersections between authoritarian governance, symbolic violence, and societal control.

Finally, the contemporary case of "Cholito," a stray dog whose tragic death incited massive social mobilization, is explored to illustrate the emergence of citizen-driven ethical demands and subsequent legislative reforms, culminating in the enactment of Law 21.020. Employing the concept of "normative ventriloquism," the study argues that legal frameworks reflect broader societal shifts towards ethical inclusivity and expanded moral consideration for non-human animals.

Collectively, the dissertation underscores that human-animal relations serve as a critical lens to examine broader dynamics of social inclusion, exclusion, and transformation, providing nuanced insights into social justice, non-human ethics, and the ongoing formation of inclusive and empathetic communities.