Poverty targeting and income impact of subsidised credit on accessed households in the Northern Mountainous Region of Vietnam

dc.date.accessioned2015-10-26T13:51:46Z
dc.date.available2015-10-26T13:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-14
dc.description.everythingGedruckte Ausg. im Verlag Kassel Univ. Press (www.upress.uni-kassel.de) erschienen.ger
dc.identifier.issn1612-9830
dc.identifier.issn2363-6033
dc.identifier.uriurn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2015080548898
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2015080548898
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKassel University Pressger
dc.rightsUrheberrechtlich geschützt
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcredit outreacheng
dc.subjectpoverty reductioneng
dc.subjectsubsidised crediteng
dc.subjectNorthern Vietnameng
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titlePoverty targeting and income impact of subsidised credit on accessed households in the Northern Mountainous Region of Vietnameng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractThis paper uses the data of 1338 rural households in the Northern Mountainous Region of Vietnam to examine the extent to which subsidised credit targets the poor and its impacts. Principal Component Analysis and Propensity Score Matching were used to evaluate the depth of outreach and the income impact of credit. To address the problem of model uncertainty, the approach of Bayesian Model Average applied to the probit model was used. Results showed that subsidised credit successfully targeted the poor households with 24.10% and 69.20% of clients falling into the poorest group and the three bottom groups respectively. Moreover, those who received subsidised credit make up 83% of ethnic minority households. These results indicate that governmental subsidies are necessary to reach the poor and low income households, who need capital but are normally bypassed by commercial banks. Analyses also showed that ethnicity and age of household heads, number of helpers, savings, as well as how affected households are by shocks were all factors that further explained the probability at which subsidised credit has been assessed. Furthermore, recipients obtained a 2.61% higher total income and a 5.93% higher farm income compared to non-recipients. However, these small magnitudes of effects are statistically insignificant at a 5% level. Although the subsidised credit is insufficient to significantly improve the income of the poor households, it possibly prevents these households of becoming even poorer.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn: Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. Kassel : Kassel University Press. - Vol. 116, No. 2 (2015), S. 173-186
dcterms.creatorLuan, Do Xuan
dcterms.creatorBauer, Siegfried
dcterms.creatorThi Lan Anh, Nguyen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JARTSVol116No2S173.pdf
Size:
94.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.23 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: