Lower-extremity resistance training on unstable surfaces improves proxies of muscle strength, power and balance in healthy older adults: a randomised control trial

dc.date.accessioned2017-06-26T10:18:59Z
dc.date.available2017-06-26T10:18:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-24
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.uriurn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2017062652719
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2017062652719
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1186/s12877-016-0366-3
dc.rightsUrheberrechtlich geschützt
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectInstability resistance trainingeng
dc.subjectMachine-based resistance trainingeng
dc.subjectFree-weight resistance trainingeng
dc.subjectUnstable surfaceseng
dc.subjectSeniorseng
dc.subject.ddc796
dc.titleLower-extremity resistance training on unstable surfaces improves proxies of muscle strength, power and balance in healthy older adults: a randomised control trialeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractBackground: It is well documented that both balance and resistance training have the potential to mitigate intrinsic fall risk factors in older adults. However, knowledge about the effects of simultaneously executed balance and resistance training (i.e., resistance training conducted on unstable surfaces [URT]) on lower-extremity muscle strength, power and balance in older adults is insufficient. The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of machine-based stable resistance training (M-SRT) and two types of URT, i.e., machine-based (M-URT) and free-weight URT (F-URT), on measures of lower-extremity muscle strength, power and balance in older adults. Methods: Seventy-five healthy community-dwelling older adults aged 65–80 years, were assigned to three intervention groups: M-SRT, M-URT and F-URT. Over a period of ten weeks, all participants exercised two times per week with each session lasting ~60 min. Tests included assessment of leg muscle strength (e.g., maximal isometric leg extension strength), power (e.g., chair rise test) and balance (e.g., functional reach test), carried out before and after the training period. Furthermore, maximal training load of the squat-movement was assessed during the last training week. Results: Maximal training load of the squat-movement was significantly lower in F-URT in comparison to M-SRT and M-URT. However, lower-extremity resistance training conducted on even and uneven surfaces meaningfully improved proxies of strength, power and balance in all groups. M-URT produced the greatest improvements in leg extension strength and F-URT in the chair rise test and functional reach test. Conclusion: Aside from two interaction effects, overall improvements in measures of lower-extremity muscle strength, power and balance were similar across training groups. Importantly, F-URT produced similar results with considerably lower training load as compared to M-SRT and M-URT. Concluding, F-URT seems an effective and safe alternative training program to mitigate intrinsic fall risk factors in older adults.ger
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn: BMC Geriatrics. - London : BioMed Central. - (2016) 16:191
dcterms.creatorEckardt, Nils

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s12877_016_0366_3.pdf
Size:
719.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.23 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: