The Phantom of the ‘Responsible Consumer’: Unmasking the Intention–Action Gap with an Indirect Questioning Technique

dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T13:26:22Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T13:26:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-03
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202201215587
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13607
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.doidoi:10.3390/su132313394
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectsocially desirable responding (SDR)eng
dc.subjectconsumer social responsibility (CnSR)eng
dc.subjectsustainable consumptioneng
dc.subjectindirect questioningeng
dc.subjectprojective techniqueseng
dc.subject.ddc330
dc.subject.swdVerbraucherverhaltenger
dc.subject.swdSoziale Verantwortungger
dc.subject.swdNachhaltigkeitger
dc.titleThe Phantom of the ‘Responsible Consumer’: Unmasking the Intention–Action Gap with an Indirect Questioning Techniqueeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.abstractThe intention-action gap stands out in research on sustainable consumption for decades. The current research explores the role of socially desirable responding (SDR) in the appearance of this gap by utilising an indirect questioning technique. Two online experiments (n=306 and n=334) demonstrate, in line with most market surveys, that consumers present themselves as highly responsible when being assessed with the standard survey measurement approach (i.e., direct questioning). However, the responses of participants toward the exact same measures of consumers’ social responsibility perceptions and behavioural intentions heavily drop when applying an indirect questioning technique, indicating a substantial overstatement of consumers’ social responsibility perceptions in traditional market surveys. Furthermore, this study provides novel evidence regarding the validity and underlying mechanism of the indirect questioning technique, thereby alleviating long-lasting concerns about this method. Implications for the intention–action gap discussion and consumer ethics research are proposed.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorKilian, Sven
dcterms.creatorMann, Andreas
dcterms.source.articlenumber13394
dcterms.source.identifiereissn: 2071-1050
dcterms.source.issueIssue 23
dcterms.source.journalSustainabilityeng
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 13
kup.iskupfalse

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sustainability_13_13394.pdf
Size:
981.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections