The confidence-accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detection

dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T10:19:23Z
dc.date.available2022-08-16T10:19:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-26
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALger
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202206016283
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14063
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1002/acp.3953
dc.rightsNamensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectaccuracyeng
dc.subjectcalibration analysiseng
dc.subjectconfidenceeng
dc.subjectlie detectioneng
dc.subjectmetacognitioneng
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.swdLügendetektorger
dc.subject.swdGenauigkeitger
dc.subject.swdMetakognitionger
dc.subject.swdVertrauenger
dc.subject.swdDatenanalyseger
dc.titleThe confidence-accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detectioneng
dc.typeAufsatz
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.abstractPrevious research has produced mixed results on the question of whether confidence in ad hoc veracity judgments can be used as an indicator of judgment accuracy. These studies have used a variety of measures to analyze the confidence-accuracy relationship; however, they have rarely explicitly addressed why a particular measure was chosen and what its properties are. We theoretically and empirically examined previously used measures of metacognition in lie detection and report the results these measures yielded in re-analyses of 12 lie detection studies (total N = 2817 participants). Regardless of the measure, none of the studies found a confidence-accuracy relationship. Discrepancies between the measures are likely due to conceptual differences between them, emphasizing the importance of carefully selecting appropriate measures for the research question at hand. More work on the underlying processes of confidence judgments in lie detection is needed to improve the assessment of confidence and the selection of appropriate measures.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorVolz, Sarah
dcterms.creatorReinhard, Marc-André
dcterms.creatorMüller, Patrick
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:1099-0720
dcterms.source.issueIssue 3
dcterms.source.journalApplied Cognitive Psychologyeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo673-684
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 36
kup.iskupfalse

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Applied_Cognitive_Psychology_2022_Volz_The_confidence_accuracy_relation_A_comparison_of_metacognition_measures_in.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections