Examining the relevance of cultural ecosystem services in forest management in Europe

dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T09:46:26Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T09:46:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kasselger
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202008051530
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11672
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.relation.doidoi:10.5751/ES-11587-250302
dc.rightsNamensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectecosystem service trade-offseng
dc.subjectmultifunctionalityeng
dc.subjectforest owners and managerseng
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.subject.swdÖkosystemdienstleistungger
dc.subject.swdForstwirtschaftger
dc.subject.swdKulturlandschaftger
dc.subject.swdWaldbesitzerger
dc.subject.swdEuropager
dc.titleExamining the relevance of cultural ecosystem services in forest management in Europeeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.abstractThe ecosystem services framework has become one of the most important paradigms in forest planning and management as a way to link the multiple provisioning, regulating, and cultural services derived from ecosystems and their benefits to human well-being. Recently, there have been multiple efforts in emphasizing the importance of cultural ecosystem services (CES). However, the consideration of CES in management models remains a challenge. In the current context of increased demand for the joint supply of multiple ecosystem services, we aim to evaluate which CES are currently promoted by European landowners, what their the future could be, and which factors support or hinder these processes. Our findings are based on a survey of 1182 forest landowners from 25 European countries. By using a mixed-method approach that combines descriptive, ordination, and cluster analysis with qualitative data, our results reveal that CES are currently of high relevance in European forests and forest owners and managers have a generally positive attitude toward further promotion of CES through forest management. There is a high degree of synergy between CES, which suggests that many of them could be jointly promoted. Our analysis further identifies the existence of four differentiated types of forest owners based on their attitudes and management in relation to CES. These groups also differ in regard to the challenges and barriers they perceive in relation to forest CES. These diverse perspectives among Europe’s landowners suggest the need for different strategies that satisfy the diverse context-related social-ecological needs required to further promote CES in European forests.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorTorralba, Mario
dcterms.creatorLovrić, Marko
dcterms.creatorRoux, Jeanne-Lazya
dcterms.creatorBudniok, Marie-Alice
dcterms.creatorMulier, Anne-Sophie
dcterms.creatorWinkel, Georg
dcterms.creatorPlieninger, Tobias
dcterms.source.identifierEISSN 1708-3087
dcterms.source.issueIssue 3
dcterms.source.journalEcology and societyeng
dcterms.source.pageinfoArt. 2
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 25
kup.iskupfalse

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ES_2020_11587.pdf
Size:
2.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections