Maintain your mind, mantain your focus: Effects of focused attention and intensity in experienced runners

dc.date.accessioned2024-03-21T12:03:51Z
dc.date.available2024-03-21T12:03:51Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-26
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202403219840
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15591
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102616
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectEndurance activitieseng
dc.subjectAutomatic control processeseng
dc.subjectDual-mode theoryger
dc.subjectFocus of attentioneng
dc.subject.ddc796
dc.subject.swdAusdaueraktivitätger
dc.subject.swdAufmerksamkeitger
dc.subject.swdIntensitätger
dc.subject.swdLäuferger
dc.titleMaintain your mind, mantain your focus: Effects of focused attention and intensity in experienced runnerseng
dc.typeAufsatz
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.abstractThe intensity that people choose for their endurance activities has a major influence on their affective experience. Furthermore, the direction of attention (e.g., internal or external) during endurance activities may significantly influence performance and ersonal perceptions. Therefore, in the current study, we focus on the interaction between intensity and attentional focus. We aim to address the question of whether adopting an internal (IAF; breathing) or an external attentional focus (EAF; environment), compared to a control condition, leads in differences in speed, heart rate, and affect during running at different intensities in experienced runners. Data from 59 participants were analyzed (Mage: 26.95 (SD = 4.78) years; 34 male; 25 female). Participants ran 9 × 3 min in an outdoor park with three intensity conditions (light, somewhat hard, hard) and three attention conditions (internal, external, control). Intensity, but not attentional focus, impacted affective responses. Results revealed a significant interaction between attentional focus and intensity on heart rate (p < 0.001, ω2p = 0.199): during the somewhat hard intensity, the control focus condition was significantly lower compared the internal and external attentional focus conditions. Additionally, we used exploratory multilevel models (MLM). In the best-fitting MLM of heart rate, 45% of the variance is attributed to differences between athletes, and thus 55% of the variance within athletes. Furthermore, the model indicated that athletes running at a somewhat hard intensity and maintaining an EAF (b = 7.69) or IAF (b = 6.36) had an increase in heart rate compared to the control condition. We speculate that simultaneously monitoring effort and following an attentional instruction was such a difficult task that led to a favorable effect for the control condition. In practice, this could mean that the implementation of an unfamiliar focus of attention, for example, initially requires additional energy expenditure.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorLimmeroth, Julia
dcterms.creatorPauly, Hannah
dcterms.creatorSchücker, Linda
dcterms.creatorZenko, Zachary
dcterms.creatorHagemann, Norbert
dcterms.source.articlenumber102616
dcterms.source.identifiereissn;1469-0292
dcterms.source.journalPsychology of Sport & Exerciseeng
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 73
kup.iskupfalse

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1_s2_0_S146902922400027X_main.pdf
Size:
449.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections