Performance comparison of a fixed-bed solar grain dryer with and without latent heat storage

dc.date.accessioned2024-06-26T12:36:11Z
dc.date.available2024-06-26T12:36:11Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-21
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-2024062610418
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15881
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100600
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectLatent heat storageeng
dc.subjectPhase change materialseng
dc.subjectModellingeng
dc.subjectSolar dryingeng
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.subject.swdGetreidelagerungger
dc.subject.swdSolartechnikger
dc.subject.swdLatentwärmespeicherger
dc.subject.swdTrocknungger
dc.titlePerformance comparison of a fixed-bed solar grain dryer with and without latent heat storageeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.abstractLatent heat storage has gained attention as an energy storage method for solar drying due to its high storage density. However, its overall impact in drying performance has not been sufficiently investigated. This study presents detailed, validated mathematical models necessary for the transient simulation of a solar dryer with latent heat storage with the aim of assessing the effect that such storage has on the deep bed drying of wheat. Computer simulations were run with weather data from Germany. A fixed bed dryer with a capacity of one ton was assumed and the size of the solar air heater and latent heat storage unit was varied, as well as the type of phase change material. In drying wheat without storage from 22% to 13% w.b. (0.28 to 0.15 kg kg -1 d.b.), increasing solar collecting area from 6 to 15 m2 reduced drying time by around 50% but resulted in excessive temperatures. At equal collecting area, the use of latent heat storage changed drying time by - 5% to +13.9% depending on component sizes, but the drying air temperature was limited effectively if solar collection and storage units are properly sized in relation to each other. Failure to do so can result in higher drying temperatures than recommended or bring little additional benefit. Moisture uniformity at the end of drying was slightly improved by up to 10% in the presence of the storage unit due to a reduction in the average drying temperature. The presented models and corresponding simulation programs are a useful tool to size the components of a solar dryer with and without latent heat storage.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorRomán, Franz
dcterms.creatorMunir, Zeeshan
dcterms.creatorHensel, Oliver
dcterms.source.articlenumberArticle 100600
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2590-1745
dcterms.source.journalEnergy Conversion and Management: Xeng
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 22
kup.iskupfalse

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1_s2_0_S2590174524000783_main.pdf
Size:
5.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections