Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T13:14:24Z
dc.date.available2020-01-14T13:14:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-30
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-20190709595
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11421
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSection Specialized Partnerships in Sustainable Food Systems and Food Sovereignty at the University of Kassel, Germany and Federation of German Scientists (VDW)
dc.rightsUrheberrechtlich geschützt
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectexternal conditionseng
dc.subjectintegrated agricultureeng
dc.subjectrice fieldseng
dc.subjectincomeeng
dc.subjectregional developmenteng
dc.subjectIndonesiaeng
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleStructural modelling of rice fields-buffalo livestock based integrated agricultural systems in the context of regional development in Humbang Hasundutan, Indonesiaeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractThis study analyses the influence of external and internal agriculture conditions on rice fields-buffalo livestock-based integrated agricultural systems in the context of regional development in the Humbang Hasundutan District. The method of analyzing data in research is structural equation modeling (SEM) with IBM SPSS® Amos 22 device. The results indicate that both external and internal agricultural conditions have a significant, positive influence on both rice field-buffalo livestock integrated agricultural systems and regional development. Furthermore, rice fields-buffalo livestock integrated agricultural systems have a significant positive influence on regional development. The direct influence of external agriculture conditions on regional development is 0,26. The indirect influence of external agriculture conditions on regional development by the intermediate of integrated agriculture systems is 0,32 and total influence is 0,58. Furthermore, the indirect influence of internal agriculture conditions on regional development is 0,24. The indirect influence of internal agriculture conditions on regional development by the intermediate of integrated agriculture systems is 0,28, with a total influence is 0,52. Based on the conclusion it is suggested that the government; a) provide guidance to improve farmers' knowledge of integrated agricultural systems; b) improve farmers’ ability to develop their farms so as to have an impact on increasing incomes; c) establish agricultural development programmes for the longer-term increase of production, which will have an impact on regional economic growth; d) assist farmers by providing access to capital for agricultural development ensure the stability of output prices of agricultural products.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorNainggolan, Hotden Leonardo
dcterms.creatorAritonang, Johndikson
dcterms.creatorSihombing, Marlon
dcterms.creatorSupriana, Tavi
dcterms.creatorTafsin, Ma'ruf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifierISSN 2197-411X
dcterms.source.issueNo 2
dcterms.source.journalFuture of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture & Societyeng
dcterms.source.pageinfoArticle Number 106
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 7


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record