View/ Open
Date
2020-06-24Author
Felde, Vincent John Martin Noah LinusRodriguez-Caballero, EmilioChamizo, SoniaRossi, FedericoUteau, DanielPeth, StephanKeck, HannesDe Philippis, RobertoBelnap, JayneEldrige, David J.Metadata
Show full item record
Aufsatz
Comment on ‘Kidron, G. J. (2018). Biocrust research: A critical view on eight common hydrological‐related paradigms and dubious theses. Ecohydrology, e2061’
Abstract
Kidron (2018) uses a straw man argument in an attempt to debunk eight putative hydrological‐related paradigms he believes to be “common among hydrologists, ecologists, or microbiologists that investigate biocrusts.” These paradigms relate to the roles of physical crusts and vascular plants in biocrust development, the major drivers (climate, porosity, hydrophobicity, and exopolysaccharides) of hydrology (infiltration and runoff), and the effect of mosses on hydrology and therefore vascular plants. We see two major problems with his arguments. First, they assume that the paradigms in question are generally accepted by biocrust researchers. Second, they are based on Kidron's (2018) world view of biocrusts, which has largely been informed by his own studies from a single, distinctly unique area of sand dunes at the Nizzana Research Site in the Negev Desert, Israel.
Citation
In: Ecohydrology Volume 13 / Issue 6 (2020-06-24) , S. e2215 ; EISSN 1936-0592Sponsorship
Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALCitation
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202009101763,
author={Felde, Vincent John Martin Noah Linus and Rodriguez-Caballero, Emilio and Chamizo, Sonia and Rossi, Federico and Uteau, Daniel and Peth, Stephan and Keck, Hannes and De Philippis, Roberto and Belnap, Jayne and Eldrige, David J.},
title={Comment on ‘Kidron, G. J. (2018). Biocrust research: A critical view on eight common hydrological‐related paradigms and dubious theses. Ecohydrology, e2061’},
journal={Ecohydrology},
year={2020}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2020$n2020 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11833 3000 Felde, Vincent John Martin Noah Linus 3010 Rodriguez-Caballero, Emilio 3010 Chamizo, Sonia 3010 Rossi, Federico 3010 Uteau, Daniel 3010 Peth, Stephan 3010 Keck, Hannes 3010 De Philippis, Roberto 3010 Belnap, Jayne 3010 Eldrige, David J. 4000 Comment on ‘Kidron, G. J. (2018). Biocrust research: A critical view on eight common hydrological‐related paradigms and dubious theses. Ecohydrology, e2061’ / Felde, Vincent John Martin Noah Linus 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11833=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Bodenmikrobiologie}} 5550 {{Ökologie}} 5550 {{Hydrologie}} 5550 {{Paradigma}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11833
2020-09-25T05:24:07Z 2020-09-25T05:24:07Z 2020-06-24 doi:10.17170/kobra-202009101763 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11833 Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 500 Comment on ‘Kidron, G. J. (2018). Biocrust research: A critical view on eight common hydrological‐related paradigms and dubious theses. Ecohydrology, e2061’ Aufsatz Kidron (2018) uses a straw man argument in an attempt to debunk eight putative hydrological‐related paradigms he believes to be “common among hydrologists, ecologists, or microbiologists that investigate biocrusts.” These paradigms relate to the roles of physical crusts and vascular plants in biocrust development, the major drivers (climate, porosity, hydrophobicity, and exopolysaccharides) of hydrology (infiltration and runoff), and the effect of mosses on hydrology and therefore vascular plants. We see two major problems with his arguments. First, they assume that the paradigms in question are generally accepted by biocrust researchers. Second, they are based on Kidron's (2018) world view of biocrusts, which has largely been informed by his own studies from a single, distinctly unique area of sand dunes at the Nizzana Research Site in the Negev Desert, Israel. open access Felde, Vincent John Martin Noah Linus Rodriguez-Caballero, Emilio Chamizo, Sonia Rossi, Federico Uteau, Daniel Peth, Stephan Keck, Hannes De Philippis, Roberto Belnap, Jayne Eldrige, David J. doi:10.1002/eco.2215 Bodenmikrobiologie Ökologie Hydrologie Paradigma publishedVersion EISSN 1936-0592 Issue 6 Ecohydrology e2215 Volume 13 false
The following license files are associated with this item: