Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T13:30:46Z
dc.date.available2022-04-26T13:30:46Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-28
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202204216058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13790
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kasselger
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectsocial trusteng
dc.subjectcommunity-based water management projects (CBWM)eng
dc.subjectclimate changeeng
dc.subjectmicro-political dynamicseng
dc.subjectcommon-pool resourceseng
dc.subjectexit strategyeng
dc.subjectIndiaeng
dc.subjectTurkeyeng
dc.subjectSri Lankaeng
dc.subject.ddc320
dc.titleBarriers in Participative Water Governance: A Critical Analysis of Community Development Approacheseng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractParticipatory approaches within development programs involving common-pool resources are intended to revive a community’s role in managing these resources. Certainly, to ensure the successful and equitable use of such resources, community participation is essential. However, in many cases, attempts at applying a participatory approach often fail to genuinely engage all subgroups within a community due to assumptions of homogeneity and a lack of understanding of the deep socio-political divisions between people. As a result, development programs can be plagued by these pre-existing power relations, potentially resulting in tokenistic community participation and the continuation of elite capture of natural resources to the same extent or worse than before a development program has begun. This in turn can negatively impact good governance and the fair distribution of a common pool resource. This paper explores the use of participatory approaches in water projects, assessing to what degree power relationships impact water management programs. Using a qualitative approach, the paper identifies key challenges of participatory water governance through case studies from Turkey, India, and Sri Lanka, exploring: lack of social trust, elite capture of participatory processes, power heterogeneity and imbalances at the micro-level, and a lack of inclusive participation in decision-making. Based on the analysis of these case studies, this paper argues that it is essential for participatory development interventions to understand socio-political power relations within a community—an inherently complex and contested space. The so-called “exit strategy” of a community project play a key role to decide the project sustainability that grants the “community ownership” of the project. Such an understanding can bring about greater success in development interventions attempting to address water-related issues.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorShunglu, Raghav
dcterms.creatorKöpke, Sören
dcterms.creatorKanoi, Lav
dcterms.creatorNissanka, Thushantha S.
dcterms.creatorWithanachchi, Chandana Rohana
dcterms.creatorGamage, Deepika U.
dcterms.creatorDissanayake, Hansani R.
dcterms.creatorKibaroglu, Aysegul
dcterms.creatorÜnver, Olcay
dcterms.creatorWithanachchi, Sisira Saddhamangala
dc.relation.doidoi:10.3390/w14050762
dc.subject.swdIndienger
dc.subject.swdTürkeiger
dc.subject.swdSri Lankager
dc.subject.swdVertrauenger
dc.subject.swdWasserwirtschaftger
dc.subject.swdKlimaänderungger
dc.subject.swdMikropolitikger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2073-4441
dcterms.source.issueIssue 5
dcterms.source.journalWatereng
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 14
kup.iskupfalse
dcterms.source.articlenumber2217


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung 4.0 International