Zur Kurzanzeige

Strategic framing of genome editing in agriculture: an analysis of the debate in Germany in the run-up to the European Court of Justice ruling

dc.date.accessioned2022-07-11T13:40:59Z
dc.date.available2022-07-11T13:40:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-09
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202205186201
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13990
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALger
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectgenome editingeng
dc.subjectCRISPReng
dc.subjectagricultural biotechnologyeng
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Justiceeng
dc.subjectstrategic framingeng
dc.subjectcompetitive framing theoryeng
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleStrategic framing of genome editing in agriculture: an analysis of the debate in Germany in the run-up to the European Court of Justice rulingeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractNew techniques in genome editing have led to a controversial debate about the opportunities and uncertainties they present for agricultural food production and consumption. In July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union defined genome editing as a new process of mutagenesis, which implies that the resulting organisms count as genetically modified and are subject, in principle, to the obligations of EU Directive 2001/18/EG. This paper examines how key protagonists from academia, politics, and the economy strategically framed the debate around genome editing in agriculture in Germany prior to its legal classification by the Court of Justice. It is based on an analysis of 96 official statements, including position papers, press releases, and information brochures. Our study reveals eight strategic frames used in the discourse on genome editing and uncovers the strategies used to disconnect from or connect with the previous discourse on green genetic engineering in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. Building on competitive framing theory, the study provides explanations for the use and emergence of counter-framing strategies and their success or failure in the debate around genome editing.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorSiebert, Robin
dcterms.creatorHerzig, Christian
dcterms.creatorBirringer, Marc
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1007/s10460-021-10274-2
dc.subject.swdDeutschlandger
dc.subject.swdGenome Editingger
dc.subject.swdCRISPR/Cas-Methodeger
dc.subject.swdLandwirtschaftger
dc.subject.swdBiotechnologieger
dc.subject.swdEuropäischer Gerichtshofger
dc.subject.swdDebatteger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:1572-8366
dcterms.source.issueIssue 2
dcterms.source.journalAgriculture and Human Valueseng
dcterms.source.pageinfo617-632
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 39
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Name:
license_rdf
Größe:
908Bytes
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Öffnen
Thumbnail
Name:
Siebert2022_Article_StrategicF ...
Größe:
710.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Öffnen

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International