Aufsatz
Voting on the threat of exclusion in a public goods experiment
Zusammenfassung
Ostracism is practiced by virtually all societies around the world as a means of enforcing cooperation. In this paper, we use a public goods experiment to study whether groups choose to implement an institution that allows for the exclusion of members. We distinguish between a costless exclusion institution and a costly exclusion institution that, if chosen, reduces the endowment of all players. We also provide a comparison with an exclusion institution that is exogenously imposed upon groups. A significant share of the experimental groups choose the exclusion institution, even when it comes at a cost, and the support for the institution increases over time. Average contributions to the public good are significantly higher when the exclusion option is available, not only because low contributors are excluded but also because high contributors sustain a higher cooperation level under the exclusion institution. Subjects who vote in favor of the exclusion institution contribute more than those who vote against it, but only when the institution is implemented. These results are largely inconsistent with standard economic theory but can be better explained by assuming heterogeneous groups in which some players have selfish and others have social preferences.
Zitierform
In: Experimental Economics (2019-04-01) 1573-6938Zitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-20190411406,
author={Dannenberg, Astrid and Haita-Falah, Corina and Zitzelsberger, Sonja},
title={Voting on the threat of exclusion in a public goods experiment},
journal={Experimental Economics},
year={2019}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2019$n2019 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11184 3000 Dannenberg, Astrid 3010 Haita-Falah, Corina 3010 Zitzelsberger, Sonja 4000 Voting on the threat of exclusion in a public goods experiment / Dannenberg, Astrid 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11184=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11184
2019-04-11T11:50:24Z 2019-04-11T11:50:24Z 2019-04-01 doi:10.17170/kobra-20190411406 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11184 eng Urheberrechtlich geschützt https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ public goods experiment cooperation ostracism institutional choice social preferences 330 Voting on the threat of exclusion in a public goods experiment Aufsatz Ostracism is practiced by virtually all societies around the world as a means of enforcing cooperation. In this paper, we use a public goods experiment to study whether groups choose to implement an institution that allows for the exclusion of members. We distinguish between a costless exclusion institution and a costly exclusion institution that, if chosen, reduces the endowment of all players. We also provide a comparison with an exclusion institution that is exogenously imposed upon groups. A significant share of the experimental groups choose the exclusion institution, even when it comes at a cost, and the support for the institution increases over time. Average contributions to the public good are significantly higher when the exclusion option is available, not only because low contributors are excluded but also because high contributors sustain a higher cooperation level under the exclusion institution. Subjects who vote in favor of the exclusion institution contribute more than those who vote against it, but only when the institution is implemented. These results are largely inconsistent with standard economic theory but can be better explained by assuming heterogeneous groups in which some players have selfish and others have social preferences. open access Dannenberg, Astrid Haita-Falah, Corina Zitzelsberger, Sonja European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 program, action ERC-2014-STG, Project HUCO, grant number 636746. doi:10.1007/s10683-019-09609-y acceptedVersion 1573-6938 Experimental Economics
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:
:Urheberrechtlich geschützt