Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2019-05-20T13:33:31Z
dc.date.available2019-05-20T13:33:31Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-07
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-20190520487
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11231
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsUrheberrechtlich geschützt
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcomposteng
dc.subjectconservation agricultureeng
dc.subjectcover cropeng
dc.subjectorganic managementeng
dc.subjectreduced tillageeng
dc.subjectseed bankeng
dc.subjectweed dynamiceng
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleCover crops and compost prevent weed seed bank buildup in herbicide‐free wheat-potato rotations under conservation tillageeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractWeeds are a major constraint affecting crop yields in organic farming and weed seed bank analysis can be an important tool for predicting weed infestation and assessing farming system sustainability. We compared the weed seed banks two and four years after transition from conventional to reduced tillage in organically managed winter wheat–potato cropping sequences in two replicated field trials. Experimental factors were either conventional (CT) with moldboard (25 cm) or reduced tillage (RT) with chisel ploughing (5–15 cm). Dead mulch (8–10 cm), consisting of rye–pea or triticale–vetch mixtures, was additionally applied to potatoes in the RT system. In both systems, one‐half of the plots received 5 t (ha/year) dry matter of a commercially sold yard waste compost as an organic amendment. Furthermore, subsidiary crops were grown in both systems, either as legume living mulches undersown in wheat or as cover crops sown after wheat. Prior to sowing the wheat and after potatoes, the soil seed bank from 0 to 12.5 and from 12.5 to 25 cm was sampled and assessed in an unheated glasshouse over nine months. The initial weed seed bank size in the topsoil was uniform (4,420 seedlings m−2). Two years later, wheat‐associated weeds, such as Galium aparine, Lamium spp., and Myosotis arvensis, were 61% higher on average in RT than in CT. This was independent of subsidiary crops used. In contrast, Chenopodium album, a potato‐associated weed that depends on intensive tillage, was reduced by 15% in the mulched RT system compared to CT. When RT was combined with cover crops and compost application, the seed bank did not differ significantly from the CT system. We conclude that subsidiary crops, mulches, and potentially compost are important management tools that contribute to the success of RT in herbicide‐free cereal‐based systems in temperate climates.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorSchmidt, Jan Henrik
dcterms.creatorJunge, Stephan
dcterms.creatorFinckh, Maria Renate
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1002/ece3.4942
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifierISSN: 2045-7758
dcterms.source.issue5
dcterms.source.journalEcology and Evolution
dcterms.source.pageinfo2715-2724
dcterms.source.volume9


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige