Öffnen
Datum
2020-05-12Schlagwort
630 Landwirtschaft, Veterinärmedizin ErnteErnteertragErnterückstandAckerbodenKohlenstofforganischerMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Robustness of visible near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopic models to changes in the quantity and quality of crop residues in soil
Zusammenfassung
The robustness of soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) content prediction accuracy by visible near-infrared spectroscopy (visNIRS) and mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) models after a change in the quantity or quality of crop residues requires investigation. Arable soils (0–20 cm) from20 locations across Germany were collected, and 0, 2, 4, or 8 g C kg soil$^{⁻1}$ of wheat straw (C/N ratio, 54) or clover (C/N ratio, 13) were added. Before and after a 56-d incubation, dried and ground samples were measured for SOC and TN content and by visNIRS and MIRS. The complete dataset (n = 280) was subdivided into calibration and validation datasets to test the robustness of partial least squares regression models to changes in crop residue quantity and quality in soil.Noise-reducing data pretreatments included region selection, moving averages, resampling every second data point, and the Savitzky-Golay algorithm. The MIRS estimates for SOC (7.4–33 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) had lower root mean squared error of validation (RMSEV = 0.9–2.9 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) compared with visNIRS (RMSEV = 1.6–7.1 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ). Total N estimates (0.7–2.8 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) were more comparable for MIRS (RMSEV = 0.1–0.3 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) and visNIRS (RMSEV = 0.1–1.0 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ).
Loadings of partial least squares regression components suggested the predictive mechanisms for SOC and TN were more similar for visNIRS than for MIRS. Differing crop residue quantity or quality in calibration versus validation resulted in biased SOC and TN estimates by visNIRS and MIRS models. However, calibration with a global residue model containing all soils and crop residue quantities and qualities lowered RMSEV for SOC and TN prediction with visNIRS and MIRS, demonstrating the usefulness of this approach.
Loadings of partial least squares regression components suggested the predictive mechanisms for SOC and TN were more similar for visNIRS than for MIRS. Differing crop residue quantity or quality in calibration versus validation resulted in biased SOC and TN estimates by visNIRS and MIRS models. However, calibration with a global residue model containing all soils and crop residue quantities and qualities lowered RMSEV for SOC and TN prediction with visNIRS and MIRS, demonstrating the usefulness of this approach.
Zitierform
In: Soil Science Society of America Journal Volume 84 / Issue 3 (2020-05-12) , S. 963-977 ; ISSN 1435-0661Förderhinweis
Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALZitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202007101440,
author={Greenberg, Isabel and Linsler, Deborah and Vohland, Michael and Ludwig, Bernard},
title={Robustness of visible near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopic models to changes in the quantity and quality of crop residues in soil},
journal={Soil Science Society of America Journal},
year={2020}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2020$n2020 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11639 3000 Greenberg, Isabel 3010 Linsler, Deborah 3010 Vohland, Michael 3010 Ludwig, Bernard 4000 Robustness of visible near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopic models to changes in the quantity and quality of crop residues in soil / Greenberg, Isabel 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11639=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Ernte}} 5550 {{Ernteertrag}} 5550 {{Ernterückstand}} 5550 {{Ackerboden}} 5550 {{Kohlenstoff}} 5550 {{organischer}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11639
2020-07-10T12:09:26Z 2020-07-10T12:09:26Z 2020-05-12 doi:10.17170/kobra-202007101440 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11639 Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 630 Robustness of visible near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopic models to changes in the quantity and quality of crop residues in soil Aufsatz The robustness of soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) content prediction accuracy by visible near-infrared spectroscopy (visNIRS) and mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) models after a change in the quantity or quality of crop residues requires investigation. Arable soils (0–20 cm) from20 locations across Germany were collected, and 0, 2, 4, or 8 g C kg soil$^{⁻1}$ of wheat straw (C/N ratio, 54) or clover (C/N ratio, 13) were added. Before and after a 56-d incubation, dried and ground samples were measured for SOC and TN content and by visNIRS and MIRS. The complete dataset (n = 280) was subdivided into calibration and validation datasets to test the robustness of partial least squares regression models to changes in crop residue quantity and quality in soil.Noise-reducing data pretreatments included region selection, moving averages, resampling every second data point, and the Savitzky-Golay algorithm. The MIRS estimates for SOC (7.4–33 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) had lower root mean squared error of validation (RMSEV = 0.9–2.9 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) compared with visNIRS (RMSEV = 1.6–7.1 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ). Total N estimates (0.7–2.8 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) were more comparable for MIRS (RMSEV = 0.1–0.3 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ) and visNIRS (RMSEV = 0.1–1.0 g kg$^{⁻1}$ ). Loadings of partial least squares regression components suggested the predictive mechanisms for SOC and TN were more similar for visNIRS than for MIRS. Differing crop residue quantity or quality in calibration versus validation resulted in biased SOC and TN estimates by visNIRS and MIRS models. However, calibration with a global residue model containing all soils and crop residue quantities and qualities lowered RMSEV for SOC and TN prediction with visNIRS and MIRS, demonstrating the usefulness of this approach. open access Greenberg, Isabel Linsler, Deborah Vohland, Michael Ludwig, Bernard doi:10.1002/saj2.20067 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/AwardNumbers:LU583/19-1,VO 1509/7-1 Ernte Ernteertrag Ernterückstand Ackerboden Kohlenstoff organischer publishedVersion ISSN 1435-0661 Issue 3 Soil Science Society of America Journal 963-977 Volume 84 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: