Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2020-12-15T10:44:53Z
dc.date.available2020-12-15T10:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-14
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202011262276
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12171
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCrop productioneng
dc.subjectextensioneng
dc.subjectinnovation diffusioneng
dc.subjectlivestock productioneng
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleAre farmer perceptions among significant determinants of adoption of agricultural diversity in Malawi? A case of Lilongwe districteng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractAgricultural diversity can strengthen resilience of livelihood of farmers to climate change and market uncertainties while, potentially at the same time, o ering better dietary and nutritional prospects for households. Adoption of agricultural diversity in Malawi is low. Policy-makers, researchers, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and extension staff need to understand dynamics of adoption of agricultural diversity in order to develop appropriate policies and interventions to promote agricultural diversification. This study was conducted in Lilongwe District of Malawi to identify factors influencing adoption of agricultural diversity and particularly to test if farmer perceptions were among significant determinants of adoption of agricultural diversity. A survey of 424 randomly sampled households was conducted in 2016 and 2017. A Tobit model, having 16 possible determinants, was run against a holistic agricultural diversity index that combined number of crop, livestock, and fruit tree species and cropping patterns. The study found that farmer perceptions were among significant determinants of adoption of agricultural diversity. Some farmers perceived that they faced problems to find seeds of preferred varieties, droughts posed problems to farming; some crops produced good yields while other crops did not. Farmers with such perceptions were less likely to practice agricultural diversification. In addition to perceptions, engagement in o -farm sources of income also negatively a ected agricultural diversity. Other factors, namely farmers’ access to land and credit, irrigation farming, selling of crops, ownership of radios, and farmer group membership fostered adoption of agricultural diversity.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorFatch, Paul Falakeza
dcterms.creatorMasangano, Charles
dcterms.creatorKamoto, Judith Fran M.
dcterms.creatorJordan, Irmgard
dcterms.creatorHilger, Thomas
dcterms.creatorMambo, Isaac
dcterms.creatorKalimbira, Alexander
dcterms.creatorNuppenau, Ernst-August
dc.subject.swdViehwirtschaftger
dc.subject.swdPflanzenbauger
dc.subject.swdDiffusionger
dc.subject.swdInnovationger
dc.subject.swdMalawierger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifierEISSN 2363-6033
dcterms.source.issueNo. 2
dcterms.source.journalJournal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS)eng
dcterms.source.pageinfo277-288
dcterms.source.volumeVol. 121
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International