Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T11:16:23Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26T11:16:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-09
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202104133658
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12739
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALger
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjecthistory and philosophy of ecologyeng
dc.subjectcommunity ecologyeng
dc.subjectpolitical philosophyeng
dc.subjectanalogyeng
dc.subjectconstitution theoryeng
dc.subject.ddc100
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.titleHow political philosophies can help to discuss and differentiate theories in community ecologyeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractThis paper uses structural analogies to competing political philosophies of human society as a heuristic tool to differentiate between ecological theories and to bring out new aspects of apparently well-known classics of ecological scholarship. These two different areas of knowledge have in common that their objects are ‘societies’, i.e. units composed of individuals, and that contradictory and competing theories about these supra-individual units exist. The benefit of discussing ecological theories in terms of their analogies to political philosophies, in this case liberalism, democratism and conservatism, consists in the fact that political philosophies show clear differences and particularities as regards their approach to the concepts of individuality and intentional action. The method therefore helps to expose peculiarities of ecological theories that are usually considered canonical (e.g. Clements, Gleason), as well as hybrid forms (E. P. Odum), and to differentiate between two different types of theories about functional wholes. The basis of this method is the constitutional-theoretical premise that modern paradigms of socialization structure the ecological discourse.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorVoigt, Annette
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1007/s40656-021-00401-x
dc.subject.swdGeschichteger
dc.subject.swdPhilosophieger
dc.subject.swdÖkologieger
dc.subject.swdPolitische Philosophieger
dc.subject.swdAnalogieger
dc.subject.swdKonstitution <Philosophie>ger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifierEISSN 1742-6316
dcterms.source.issueIssue 2
dcterms.source.journalHistory and Philosophy of the Life Scienceseng
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 43
kup.iskupfalse
dcterms.source.articlenumber54


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International