Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T13:54:09Z
dc.date.available2022-09-07T13:54:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-15
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202207126459
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14134
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEALger
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectaxiological sociologyeng
dc.subjectOrders of wortheng
dc.subjectpublic and private health insuranceeng
dc.subjectsociology of conventionseng
dc.subjecttheory developmenteng
dc.subject.ddc370
dc.titleSocialism Order of Worth and Analytical Adequacy Axiomeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractBoltanski and Thévenot (On justification. Economies of worth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006) constructed in their seminal work On Justification the Orders of Worth (OW) framework as a research program for further empirical and theoretical development. This article suggests two methodological additions to extend the analytical capacities of the OW framework: The Socialism OW and the analytical adequacy axiom. The polito-philosophical Socialism OW, which acknowledges '(collective) welfare' as its mode of evaluation (worth) and the higher principle of 'solidarity' as its test, is rooted in the political philosophy of Rosanvallon (The society of equals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2013). In addition to the systematic justification of the canonical text, this article also offers a tabular presentation for the construction of a new OW in relation to the axioms. In the article, first, the existing OW are put under scrutiny discussing the test category of solidarity, which was added and creates an analytic overload for the Civic OW. Second, analyzing the case of the German binary statutory health system, comprising of a private (first-class) and a public (second-class) healthcare, the capacities of the existing OW are discussed to identify a blank spot in the OW framework for empirical analysis. Accordingly, the descriptive analysis of the German binary health system is less about how the system is justified, and much more about understanding how given OW operate within it as coordinative devices. This systematic analysis of a situation of (temporary) agreements, especially of investments in forms, amends the OW use for empirical analysis of critique and justification in a situation.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorSchneijderberg, Christian
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1007/s10746-022-09629-3
dc.subject.swdSoziologieger
dc.subject.swdWertphilosophieger
dc.subject.swdKonventionger
dc.subject.swdPrivate Krankenversicherungger
dc.subject.swdGesetzliche Krankenversicherungger
dc.subject.swdEntwicklungstheorieger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:1572-851X
dcterms.source.issueIssue 2
dcterms.source.journalHuman Studieseng
dcterms.source.pageinfo283-308
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 45
kup.iskupfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International