Datum
2022-08-11Schlagwort
150 Psychologie 300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie Terror-Management-TheorieSterblichkeitSoziale NormMetaanalyseBiasMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies
Zusammenfassung
Terror management theory postulates that mortality salience (MS) increases the motivation to defend one’s cultural worldviews. How that motivation is expressed may depend on the social norm that is momentarily salient. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies that manipulated MS and social norm salience. Results based on 64 effect sizes for the hypothesized interaction between MS and norm salience revealed a small-to-medium effect of g = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [0.26, 0.41]. Bias-adjustment techniques suggested the presence of publication bias and/or the exploitation of researcher degrees of freedom and arrived at smaller effect size estimates for the hypothesized interaction, in several cases reducing the effect to nonsignificance (range gcorrected = −0.36 to 0.15). To increase confidence in the idea that MS and norm salience interact to influence behavior, preregistered, high-powered experiments using validated norm salience manipulations are necessary. Concomitantly, more specific theorizing is needed to identify reliable boundary conditions of the effect.
Zitierform
In: Personality and Social Psychology Review (PSPR) Volume 27 / Issue 2 (2022-08-11) , S. 195-225 ; eissn:1532-7957Förderhinweis
Gefördert im Rahmen eines Open-Access-Transformationsvertrags mit dem VerlagZitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202304197845,
author={Schindler, Simon and Hildard, Joe and Fritsche, Immo and Burke, Brian and Pfattheicher, Stefan},
title={Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies},
journal={Personality and Social Psychology Review (PSPR)},
year={2022}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2022$n2022 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14628 3000 Schindler, Simon 3010 Hildard, Joe 3010 Fritsche, Immo 3010 Burke, Brian 3010 Pfattheicher, Stefan 4000 Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies / Schindler, Simon 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14628=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Terror-Management-Theorie}} 5550 {{Sterblichkeit}} 5550 {{Soziale Norm}} 5550 {{Metaanalyse}} 5550 {{Bias}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14628
2023-04-24T12:07:41Z 2023-04-24T12:07:41Z 2022-08-11 doi:10.17170/kobra-202304197845 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14628 Gefördert im Rahmen eines Open-Access-Transformationsvertrags mit dem Verlag eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ terror management theory mortality salience social norms publication bias meta-analysis 150 300 Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies Aufsatz Terror management theory postulates that mortality salience (MS) increases the motivation to defend one’s cultural worldviews. How that motivation is expressed may depend on the social norm that is momentarily salient. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies that manipulated MS and social norm salience. Results based on 64 effect sizes for the hypothesized interaction between MS and norm salience revealed a small-to-medium effect of g = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [0.26, 0.41]. Bias-adjustment techniques suggested the presence of publication bias and/or the exploitation of researcher degrees of freedom and arrived at smaller effect size estimates for the hypothesized interaction, in several cases reducing the effect to nonsignificance (range gcorrected = −0.36 to 0.15). To increase confidence in the idea that MS and norm salience interact to influence behavior, preregistered, high-powered experiments using validated norm salience manipulations are necessary. Concomitantly, more specific theorizing is needed to identify reliable boundary conditions of the effect. open access Schindler, Simon Hildard, Joe Fritsche, Immo Burke, Brian Pfattheicher, Stefan doi:10.1177/10888683221107267 Terror-Management-Theorie Sterblichkeit Soziale Norm Metaanalyse Bias publishedVersion eissn:1532-7957 Issue 2 Personality and Social Psychology Review (PSPR) 195-225 Volume 27 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: