Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-24T12:07:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-24T12:07:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-08-11 | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.17170/kobra-202304197845 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14628 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Gefördert im Rahmen eines Open-Access-Transformationsvertrags mit dem Verlag | ger |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.rights | Namensnennung 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | terror management theory | eng |
| dc.subject | mortality salience | eng |
| dc.subject | social norms | eng |
| dc.subject | publication bias | eng |
| dc.subject | meta-analysis | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 150 | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 300 | |
| dc.title | Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies | eng |
| dc.type | Aufsatz | |
| dcterms.abstract | Terror management theory postulates that mortality salience (MS) increases the motivation to defend one’s cultural worldviews. How that motivation is expressed may depend on the social norm that is momentarily salient. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies that manipulated MS and social norm salience. Results based on 64 effect sizes for the hypothesized interaction between MS and norm salience revealed a small-to-medium effect of g = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [0.26, 0.41]. Bias-adjustment techniques suggested the presence of publication bias and/or the exploitation of researcher degrees of freedom and arrived at smaller effect size estimates for the hypothesized interaction, in several cases reducing the effect to nonsignificance (range gcorrected = −0.36 to 0.15). To increase confidence in the idea that MS and norm salience interact to influence behavior, preregistered, high-powered experiments using validated norm salience manipulations are necessary. Concomitantly, more specific theorizing is needed to identify reliable boundary conditions of the effect. | eng |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | |
| dcterms.creator | Schindler, Simon | |
| dcterms.creator | Hildard, Joe | |
| dcterms.creator | Fritsche, Immo | |
| dcterms.creator | Burke, Brian | |
| dcterms.creator | Pfattheicher, Stefan | |
| dc.relation.doi | doi:10.1177/10888683221107267 | |
| dc.subject.swd | Terror-Management-Theorie | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Sterblichkeit | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Soziale Norm | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Metaanalyse | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Bias | ger |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
| dcterms.source.identifier | eissn:1532-7957 | |
| dcterms.source.issue | Issue 2 | |
| dcterms.source.journal | Personality and Social Psychology Review (PSPR) | eng |
| dcterms.source.pageinfo | 195-225 | |
| dcterms.source.volume | Volume 27 | |
| kup.iskup | false |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource
Das Dokument erscheint in:
-
Artikel [1106]
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International