Datum
2021-12-01Autor
Soininen, NikoRaymond, Christopher MarkTuomisto, HannaRuotsalainen, LauraThorén, HenrikHorcea-Milcu, Andra-IoanaStojanovic, MilutinLehtinen, SannaMazac, RachelLamuela, CarlosKorpelainen, NooraVainio, AnnukkaToivanen, ReettaMcPhearson, TimonNagatsu, MichiruSchlagwort
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie 500 Naturwissenschaften NachhaltigkeitWissenschaftForschungManagementWissenschaftliche KooperationReflexivitätMobilitätLebensmittelproduktionMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Bridge over troubled water: managing compatibility and conflict among thought collectives in sustainability science
Zusammenfassung
Sustainability transformations call forth new forms and systems of knowledge across society. However, few tools and processes exist for promoting dialogue among different interests and normative stances in knowledge co-creation. In this article, we build on the notion of thought collectives to argue that understanding and moderating normative tensions are necessary if sustainability science is to provide successful solutions. Drawing on an analysis of the normative tensions between rival high-tech and low-tech thought collectives in the mobility and food production sectors, we discuss three strategic approaches: applying common evaluative frameworks, building contextual convergence and embracing complexity. We argue that these strategies indicate a need to distinguish different kinds of reflexivity in managing tensions among thought collectives. As a practical conclusion, we establish sets of reflexive questions to help sustainability scientists deploy the knowledge management strategies discussed.
Zitierform
In: Sustainability Science Volume 17 / Issue 1 (2021-12-01) , S. 27-44 ; eissn:1862-4057Förderhinweis
Open access funding provided by University of Eastern Finland (UEF) including Kuopio University Hospital.Zitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-2024061210341,
author={Soininen, Niko and Raymond, Christopher Mark and Tuomisto, Hanna and Ruotsalainen, Laura and Thorén, Henrik and Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana and Stojanovic, Milutin and Lehtinen, Sanna and Mazac, Rachel and Lamuela, Carlos and Korpelainen, Noora and Vainio, Annukka and Toivanen, Reetta and McPhearson, Timon and Nagatsu, Michiru},
title={Bridge over troubled water: managing compatibility and conflict among thought collectives in sustainability science},
journal={Sustainability Science},
year={2021}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2021$n2021 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15842 3000 Soininen, Niko 3010 Raymond, Christopher Mark 3010 Tuomisto, Hanna 3010 Ruotsalainen, Laura 3010 Thorén, Henrik 3010 Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana 3010 Stojanovic, Milutin 3010 Lehtinen, Sanna 3010 Mazac, Rachel 3010 Lamuela, Carlos 3010 Korpelainen, Noora 3010 Vainio, Annukka 3010 Toivanen, Reetta 3010 McPhearson, Timon 3010 Nagatsu, Michiru 4000 Bridge over troubled water: managing compatibility and conflict among thought collectives in sustainability science / Soininen, Niko 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15842=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Nachhaltigkeit}} 5550 {{Wissenschaft}} 5550 {{Forschung}} 5550 {{Management}} 5550 {{Wissenschaftliche Kooperation}} 5550 {{Reflexivität}} 5550 {{Mobilität}} 5550 {{Lebensmittelproduktion}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15842
2024-06-14T07:49:26Z 2024-06-14T07:49:26Z 2021-12-01 doi:10.17170/kobra-2024061210341 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15842 Open access funding provided by University of Eastern Finland (UEF) including Kuopio University Hospital. eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ thought collective sustainability science research management reflexivity mobility food production 300 500 Bridge over troubled water: managing compatibility and conflict among thought collectives in sustainability science Aufsatz Sustainability transformations call forth new forms and systems of knowledge across society. However, few tools and processes exist for promoting dialogue among different interests and normative stances in knowledge co-creation. In this article, we build on the notion of thought collectives to argue that understanding and moderating normative tensions are necessary if sustainability science is to provide successful solutions. Drawing on an analysis of the normative tensions between rival high-tech and low-tech thought collectives in the mobility and food production sectors, we discuss three strategic approaches: applying common evaluative frameworks, building contextual convergence and embracing complexity. We argue that these strategies indicate a need to distinguish different kinds of reflexivity in managing tensions among thought collectives. As a practical conclusion, we establish sets of reflexive questions to help sustainability scientists deploy the knowledge management strategies discussed. open access Soininen, Niko Raymond, Christopher Mark Tuomisto, Hanna Ruotsalainen, Laura Thorén, Henrik Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana Stojanovic, Milutin Lehtinen, Sanna Mazac, Rachel Lamuela, Carlos Korpelainen, Noora Vainio, Annukka Toivanen, Reetta McPhearson, Timon Nagatsu, Michiru doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01068-w Nachhaltigkeit Wissenschaft Forschung Management Wissenschaftliche Kooperation Reflexivität Mobilität Lebensmittelproduktion publishedVersion eissn:1862-4057 Issue 1 Sustainability Science 27-44 Volume 17 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: