Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2024-06-14T13:59:25Z
dc.date.available2024-06-14T13:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-14
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-2024061410357
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15853
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectmode-2 scienceeng
dc.subjectpowereng
dc.subjectreflexivityeng
dc.subjectsystems thinkingeng
dc.subjecttransformation knowledgeeng
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc330
dc.titleTransformative research for sustainability: characteristics, tensions, and moving forwardeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractTechnical summary: The question of how science can become a lever in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals permeates most recent sustainability research. Wide-ranging literature calling for a transformative approach has emerged in recent years. This ‘transformative turn’ is fueled by publications from fields such as sustainability science, social-ecological research, conservation science, sustainability transitions, or sustainability governance studies. However, there is a lack of a shared understanding specifically of what is meant for research to be transformative in this developing discourse around doing science differently to tackle sustainability problems. We aim to advance transformative research for sustainability. We define transformative research and outline six of its characteristics: (1) interventional nature and a theory of change focus; (2) collaborative modes of knowledge production, experimentation and learning; (3) systems thinking literacy and contextualization; (4) reflexivity, normative and inner dimensions; (5) local agency, decolonization, and reshaping power; (6) new quality criteria and rethinking impact. We highlight three tensions between transformative research and traditional paradigms of academic research: (1) process- and output-orientation; (2) accountability toward society and toward science; (3) methodologies rooted in scientific traditions and post-normal methodologies. We conclude with future directions on how academia could reconcile these tensions to support and promote transformative research. Non-technical summary: Dominant ways of doing research are not enough to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The typical response of science to dealing with the current local and global sustainability crises is to produce and accumulate more knowledge. Transformative research seeks to couple knowledge production with co-creating change. This paper defines the transformative way of doing research to pro-actively support society's fight against pressing societal and environmental problems. We present six characteristics of transformative research. We reflect on the challenges related to implementing these characteristics in scientific practice and on how academia can play its part. Social media summary: Sustainability transformation needs to be reflected in science, but what makes sustainability research transformative?eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorHorcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana
dcterms.creatorDorresteijn, Ine
dcterms.creatorLeventon, Julia
dcterms.creatorStojanovic, Milutin
dcterms.creatorLam, David P. M.
dcterms.creatorLang, Daniel J.
dcterms.creatorMoriggi, Angela
dcterms.creatorRaymond, Christopher M.
dcterms.creatorStålhammar, Sanna
dcterms.creatorWeiser, Annika
dcterms.creatorZimmermann, Silja
dcterms.extent16 Seiten
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1017/sus.2024.1
dc.subject.swdReflexivitätger
dc.subject.swdNachhaltigkeitger
dc.subject.swdWissensmanagementger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2059-4798
dcterms.source.journalGlobal Sustainabilityeng
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 7
kup.iskupfalse
dcterms.source.articlenumbere14


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung 4.0 International