Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T12:37:15Z
dc.date.available2024-08-09T12:37:15Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-03
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-2024080110618
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15967
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectlandscape valueseng
dc.subjectlandscape managementeng
dc.subjectparticipatory mappingeng
dc.subjectlocal knowledgeeng
dc.subjectprotected areaseng
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.titleAssociations between landscape values, self-reported knowledge, and land-use: a public participation GIS assessmenteng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractWhile previous socio-ecological systems research has shown relationships between local knowledge and the assignment of landscape values, the relationships between value assignment and more nuanced forms of local knowledge remain less understood. This study makes use of public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS), a method for identifying and mapping landscape attributes important to local communities. We use this method to assess the spatial associations between three landscape attributes often overlooked in the PPGIS literature: landscape values, self-reported knowledge about different types of landscape management practices and land-use types. We analyzed responses from residents of Mjölby kommun, Sweden (n = 301) using Monte Carlo simulations and density-based clustering. Overall, we found stronger spatial associations between landscape values and land-use types compared with landscape values and self-reported knowledge about landscape management. For example, significant positive associations were found between aesthetic and recreation values and certain land-use types, but there was no association between these values and self-reported knowledge. The land-use type to which a landscape value is assigned is sometimes supported by self-reported knowledge (especially for underrepresented landscape values), while self-reported knowledge did not provide a conclusive pattern about value assignment on its own. We discuss the implications of using PPGIS in integrated landscape management for building multifunctionality in landscape management by addressing the values of different land-use stakeholders, and the potential benefits of increased inclusivity in forms of local knowledge.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorZaman, Sara
dcterms.creatorKorpilo, Silviya
dcterms.creatorHorcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana
dcterms.creatorRaymond, Christopher
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1080/26395916.2022.2052749
dc.subject.swdLandschaftger
dc.subject.swdWertger
dc.subject.swdLandschaftspflegeger
dc.subject.swdGeoinformationssystemger
dc.subject.swdLandnutzungger
dc.subject.swdLokales Wissenger
dc.subject.swdGeschützte Naturger
dc.subject.swdÖffentliche Beteiligungger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2639-5916
dcterms.source.issueIssue 1
dcterms.source.journalEcosystems and Peopleeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo212-225
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 18
kup.iskupfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung 4.0 International