Show simple item record

Examining the training design and training transfer of a boundary management training: A randomized controlled intervention study

dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T13:24:41Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T13:24:41Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-15
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-2024091110817
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16038
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectboundary creationeng
dc.subjectboundary managementeng
dc.subjectintervention studyeng
dc.subjectrecoveryeng
dc.subjecttraining designeng
dc.subjecttraining transfereng
dc.subjectwell-beingeng
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.ddc330
dc.titleExamining the training design and training transfer of a boundary management training: A randomized controlled intervention studyeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractIn our mobile working world, boundaries between work and non-work domains are more and more blurred, which can impair professionals' recovery and well-being. Consequently, managing work–non-work boundaries represents an important challenge for professionals. Research suggests that boundary work tactics conveyed in boundary management interventions may promote recovery and well-being. However, the efficacy of boundary work tactics is largely unknown, as well as theoretical mechanisms that may explain the effectiveness of boundary management interventions in regard of both training design and training transfer. Building on the social cognitive theory of self-regulation, we develop a web-based boundary management training. Based on the integrated training transfer and effectiveness model, we evaluate its effects on the three levels of training effectiveness: (1) perceived learning, (2) cognitions and behaviours, with boundary control and boundary creation as indicators, and (3) recovery and well-being. Results of our randomized controlled intervention study show several expected changes in boundary creation, suggesting that drawing on the social cognitive theory of self-regulation for training design can result in effective behaviour change. Intervention effects on recovery and well-being are more ambiguous, hinting at the power but likewise potential limitations of boundary creation.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorReinke, Kathrin
dcterms.creatorOhly, Sandra
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1111/joop.12497
dc.subject.swdWork-Life-Balanceeng
dc.subject.swdAbgrenzungger
dc.subject.swdErholungger
dc.subject.swdTelearbeitger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:2044-8325
dcterms.source.issueIssue 3
dcterms.source.journalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychologyeng
dcterms.source.pageinfo864-888
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 97
kup.iskupfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
license_rdf
Size:
908bytes
Format:
application/rdf+xml
View/Open
Thumbnail
Name:
J_Occupat_Organ_Psyc_2024_Rein ...
Size:
727.4Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung 4.0 International