Datum
2020Schlagwort
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ArchetypusCluster <Datenanalyse>WissenTransformationForschungNachhaltigkeitTransdisziplinaritätMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Research pathways to foster transformation: linking sustainability science and social-ecological systems research
Zusammenfassung
Although sustainability science and social-ecological systems research pursue very similar goals, i.e., generate problem- and solution-oriented knowledge to foster sustainability transformation, they partly apply different research approaches and use different key concepts. Our aim is to identify archetypes of sustainability transformation research derived for sustainability science and social-ecological systems research that make knowledge from the two research pathways more accessible to each other in order to foster transformation. To reach this goal, we applied a mixed method approach toward an archetype analysis, based on semantic networks and clusters. Our findings point out that the fields of sustainability science and social-ecological systems research are rather coherent and not so distinct as may be expected, especially in terms of normative goals and addressed topics. Our analysis inductively reveals four archetypes of sustainability transformation research, with thematic structures clustered around (1) environmental change and ecosystem services; (2) resilience and vulnerability; (3) knowledge production for sustainability; and (4) governance for sustainability. We describe how these archetypes interact and facilitate dialogue between the fields. When considering the two transformation research pathways from the perspective of the research mode of transdisciplinary research, their discourses appear more disconnected. To fill this gap, we uncover key concepts that can strengthen the connection of the two fields to inform and foster sustainability transformations. These concepts involve engaging with nonacademic actors and seeking impact in policy.
Zitierform
In: Ecology & Society Volume 25 / No. 1 (2020) eissn:1708-3087Zitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-2024102110976,
author={Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana and Martín-López, Berta and Lam, David Patrick Michael and Lang, Daniel J.},
title={Research pathways to foster transformation: linking sustainability science and social-ecological systems research},
journal={Ecology & Society},
year={2020}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2020$n2020 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16103 3000 Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana 3010 Martín-López, Berta 3010 Lam, David Patrick Michael 3010 Lang, Daniel J. 4000 Research pathways to foster transformation: linking sustainability science and social-ecological systems research / Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16103=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Archetypus}} 5550 {{Cluster <Datenanalyse>}} 5550 {{Wissen}} 5550 {{Transformation}} 5550 {{Forschung}} 5550 {{Nachhaltigkeit}} 5550 {{Transdisziplinarität}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16103
2024-10-21T13:26:01Z 2024-10-21T13:26:01Z 2020 doi:10.17170/kobra-2024102110976 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16103 eng Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ archetypes bridging concepts cluster interface knowledge sustainability transformation research transdisciplinary 300 Research pathways to foster transformation: linking sustainability science and social-ecological systems research Aufsatz Although sustainability science and social-ecological systems research pursue very similar goals, i.e., generate problem- and solution-oriented knowledge to foster sustainability transformation, they partly apply different research approaches and use different key concepts. Our aim is to identify archetypes of sustainability transformation research derived for sustainability science and social-ecological systems research that make knowledge from the two research pathways more accessible to each other in order to foster transformation. To reach this goal, we applied a mixed method approach toward an archetype analysis, based on semantic networks and clusters. Our findings point out that the fields of sustainability science and social-ecological systems research are rather coherent and not so distinct as may be expected, especially in terms of normative goals and addressed topics. Our analysis inductively reveals four archetypes of sustainability transformation research, with thematic structures clustered around (1) environmental change and ecosystem services; (2) resilience and vulnerability; (3) knowledge production for sustainability; and (4) governance for sustainability. We describe how these archetypes interact and facilitate dialogue between the fields. When considering the two transformation research pathways from the perspective of the research mode of transdisciplinary research, their discourses appear more disconnected. To fill this gap, we uncover key concepts that can strengthen the connection of the two fields to inform and foster sustainability transformations. These concepts involve engaging with nonacademic actors and seeking impact in policy. open access Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana Martín-López, Berta Lam, David Patrick Michael Lang, Daniel J. doi:10.5751/ES-11332-250113 Archetypus Cluster <Datenanalyse> Wissen Transformation Forschung Nachhaltigkeit Transdisziplinarität publishedVersion eissn:1708-3087 No. 1 Ecology & Society Volume 25 false 13
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: