Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2014-10-30T09:33:14Z
dc.date.available2014-10-30T09:33:14Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1297-9686
dc.identifier.uridoi:10.1186/1297-9686-45-12
dc.identifier.uriOA-GEF
dc.identifier.uriurn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2014103046184
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2014103046184
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.rightsUrheberrechtlich geschützt
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.titleEnlarging a training set for genomic selction by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architectureeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractBackground: The most common application of imputation is to infer genotypes of a high-density panel of markers on animals that are genotyped for a low-density panel. However, the increase in accuracy of genomic predictions resulting from an increase in the number of markers tends to reach a plateau beyond a certain density. Another application of imputation is to increase the size of the training set with un-genotyped animals. This strategy can be particularly successful when a set of closely related individuals are genotyped. ----- Methods: Imputation on completely un-genotyped dams was performed using known genotypes from the sire of each dam, one offspring and the offspring’s sire. Two methods were applied based on either allele or haplotype frequencies to infer genotypes at ambiguous loci. Results of these methods and of two available software packages were compared. Quality of imputation under different population structures was assessed. The impact of using imputed dams to enlarge training sets on the accuracy of genomic predictions was evaluated for different populations, heritabilities and sizes of training sets. ----- Results: Imputation accuracy ranged from 0.52 to 0.93 depending on the population structure and the method used. The method that used allele frequencies performed better than the method based on haplotype frequencies. Accuracy of imputation was higher for populations with higher levels of linkage disequilibrium and with larger proportions of markers with more extreme allele frequencies. Inclusion of imputed dams in the training set increased the accuracy of genomic predictions. Gains in accuracy ranged from close to zero to 37.14%, depending on the simulated scenario. Generally, the larger the accuracy already obtained with the genotyped training set, the lower the increase in accuracy achieved by adding imputed dams. ----- Conclusions: Whenever a reference population resembling the family configuration considered here is available, imputation can be used to achieve an extra increase in accuracy of genomic predictions by enlarging the training set with completely un-genotyped dams. This strategy was shown to be particularly useful for populations with lower levels of linkage disequilibrium, for genomic selection on traits with low heritability, and for species or breeds for which the size of the reference population is limited.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn: Genetics selection evolution. - London : BioMed Central, 2013, 45:12
dcterms.creatorPimentel, Eduardo C. G.
dcterms.creatorWensch-Dorendorf, Monika
dcterms.creatorKönig, Sven
dcterms.creatorSwalve, Hermann H.
dc.publisher.placeLondon
dcterms.source.issue12
dcterms.source.journalGenetics Selection Evolution
dcterms.source.pageinfoS. 2-12
dcterms.source.volume45


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record