Datum
2016-10-20Autor
Paul, Birthe K.Muhimuzi, Fabrice L.Bacigale, Samy B.Wimba, Benjamin M. M.Chiuri, Wanjiku L.Amzati, Gaston S.Maass, Brigitte L.Schlagwort
630 Landwirtschaft, VeterinärmedizinMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Towards an assessment of on-farm niches for improved forages in Sud-Kivu, DR Congo
Zusammenfassung
Inadequate quantity and quality of livestock feed is a persistent constraint to productivity for mixed crop-livestock farming in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. To assess on-farm niches of improved forages, demonstration trials and participatory on-farm research were conducted in four different sites. Forage legumes included Canavalia brasiliensis (CIAT 17009), Stylosanthes guianensis (CIAT 11995) and Desmodium uncinatum (cv. Silverleaf), while grasses were Guatemala grass (Tripsacum andersonii), Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) French Cameroon, and a local Napier line. Within the first six months, forage legumes adapted differently to the four sites with little differences among varieties, while forage grasses displayed higher variability in biomass production among varieties than among sites. Farmers’ ranking largely corresponded to herbage yield from the first cut, preferring Canavalia, Silverleaf desmodium and Napier French Cameroon. Choice of forages and integration into farming systems depended on land availability, soil erosion prevalence and livestock husbandry system. In erosion prone sites, 55–60% of farmers planted grasses on field edges and 16–30% as hedgerows for erosion control. 43% of farmers grew forages as intercrop with food crops such as maize and cassava, pointing to land scarcity. Only in the site with lower land pressure, 71% of farmers grew legumes as pure stand. When land tenure was not secured and livestock freely roaming, 75% of farmers preferred to grow annual forage legumes instead of perennial grasses. Future research should develop robust decision support for spatial and temporal integration of forage technologies into diverse smallholder cropping systems and agro-ecologies.
Zitierform
In: Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. Kassel : Kassel University Press. - Vol. 117, No. 2 (2016), S. 243-254Sammlung(en)
Vol 117, No 2 (2016) (Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS))Zitieren
@article{urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016092050939,
author={Paul, Birthe K. and Muhimuzi, Fabrice L. and Bacigale, Samy B. and Wimba, Benjamin M. M. and Chiuri, Wanjiku L. and Amzati, Gaston S. and Maass, Brigitte L.},
title={Towards an assessment of on-farm niches for improved forages in Sud-Kivu, DR Congo},
year={2016}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2016$n2016 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016092050939 3000 Paul, Birthe K. 3010 Muhimuzi, Fabrice L. 3010 Bacigale, Samy B. 3010 Wimba, Benjamin M. M. 3010 Chiuri, Wanjiku L. 3010 Amzati, Gaston S. 3010 Maass, Brigitte L. 4000 Towards an assessment of on-farm niches for improved forages in Sud-Kivu, DR Congo / Paul, Birthe K. 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016092050939=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 7136 ##0##urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016092050939
2016-11-14T14:55:23Z 2016-11-14T14:55:23Z 2016-10-20 1612-9830 2363-6033 urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016092050939 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2016092050939 eng Kassel University Press Urheberrechtlich geschützt https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ mixed crop-livestock systems tropical forages Napier grass farming system research participatory research 630 Towards an assessment of on-farm niches for improved forages in Sud-Kivu, DR Congo Aufsatz Inadequate quantity and quality of livestock feed is a persistent constraint to productivity for mixed crop-livestock farming in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. To assess on-farm niches of improved forages, demonstration trials and participatory on-farm research were conducted in four different sites. Forage legumes included Canavalia brasiliensis (CIAT 17009), Stylosanthes guianensis (CIAT 11995) and Desmodium uncinatum (cv. Silverleaf), while grasses were Guatemala grass (Tripsacum andersonii), Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) French Cameroon, and a local Napier line. Within the first six months, forage legumes adapted differently to the four sites with little differences among varieties, while forage grasses displayed higher variability in biomass production among varieties than among sites. Farmers’ ranking largely corresponded to herbage yield from the first cut, preferring Canavalia, Silverleaf desmodium and Napier French Cameroon. Choice of forages and integration into farming systems depended on land availability, soil erosion prevalence and livestock husbandry system. In erosion prone sites, 55–60% of farmers planted grasses on field edges and 16–30% as hedgerows for erosion control. 43% of farmers grew forages as intercrop with food crops such as maize and cassava, pointing to land scarcity. Only in the site with lower land pressure, 71% of farmers grew legumes as pure stand. When land tenure was not secured and livestock freely roaming, 75% of farmers preferred to grow annual forage legumes instead of perennial grasses. Future research should develop robust decision support for spatial and temporal integration of forage technologies into diverse smallholder cropping systems and agro-ecologies. open access In: Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. Kassel : Kassel University Press. - Vol. 117, No. 2 (2016), S. 243-254 Paul, Birthe K. Muhimuzi, Fabrice L. Bacigale, Samy B. Wimba, Benjamin M. M. Chiuri, Wanjiku L. Amzati, Gaston S. Maass, Brigitte L. Gedruckte Ausg. im Verlag Kassel Univ. Press (www.upress.uni-kassel.de) erschienen.
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:
:Urheberrechtlich geschützt