Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T10:05:23Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T10:05:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-20
dc.identifier.issn2225-1154
dc.identifier.uriurn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2018082056151
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2018082056151
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch den Publikationsfonds der Universität Kassel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectstatistical downscalingeng
dc.subjectquantile mapping bias correctioneng
dc.subjectSWAT hydrological modeleng
dc.subjectdependable water releaseeng
dc.subjectZarrine River Basin of Iraneng
dc.subject.ddc500
dc.titleEvaluation of Statistical-Downscaling/Bias-Correction Methods to Predict Hydrologic Responses to Climate Change in the Zarrine River Basin, Iraneng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractModeling the hydrologic responses to future changes of climate is important for improving adaptive water management. In the present application to the Zarrine River Basin (ZRB), with the major reach being the main inflow source of Lake Urmia (LU), firstly future daily temperatures and precipitation are predicted using two statistical downscaling methods: the classical statistical downscaling model (SDSM), augmented by a trend-preserving bias correction, and a two-step updated quantile mapping (QM) method. The general circulation models (GCM) input to SDSM are climate predictors of the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2) GCM under the representative concentration pathway (RCP) emission scenarios, RCP45 and RCP85, whereas that to the QM is provided by the most suitable of several Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) GCMs under RCP60, in addition. The performances of the two downscaling methods are compared to each other for a past “future” period (2006–2016) and the QM is found to be better and so is selected in the subsequent ZR streamflow simulations by means of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model, calibrated and validated for the reference period (1991–2012). The impacts of climate change on the hydrologic response of the river basin, specifically the inflow to the Boukan Reservoir, the reservoir-dependable water release (DWR), are then compared for the three RCPs in the near- (2020–2038), middle- (2050–2068) and far- (2080–2098) future periods assuming (1) the “current” consumptive demand to be continued in the future, and (2) a more conservative “recommended” demand. A systematic future shortage of the available water is obtained for case (1) which can be mitigated somewhat for (2). Finally, the SWAT-predicted ZRB outflow is compared with the Montana-based estimated environmental flow of the ZR. The latter can successfully be sustained at good and fair levels for the near- and middle-future periods, but not so for the summer months of the far-future period, particularly, for RCP85.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn: Climate. - Basel : MDPI. - 2018, 6(2), 30, 1-26
dcterms.creatorEmami, Farzad
dcterms.creatorKoch, Manfred
dc.relation.doidoi:10.3390/cli6020030


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record