Datum
2019-08-24Autor
Kenter, Jasper O.Raymond, Christopher Markvan Riper, Carena JoleenAzzopardi, ElaineBrear, Michelle RhondaCalcagni, FulviaChristie, IanChristie, MichaelFordham, AnneGould, Rachelle K.Ives, Christopher D.Hejnowicz, Adam PeterGunton, RichardHorcea-Milcu, Andra-IoanaKendal, DaveKronenberg, JakubMassenberg, Julian RichardO’Connor, SebRavenscroft, NeilRawluk, AndreaRaymond, Ivan J.Rodríguez‑Morales, JorgeThankappan, SamarthiaSchlagwort
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie GrundwerteUmweltErkenntnistheorieInterdisziplinaritätÖkosystemdienstleistungNachhaltigkeitMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability
Zusammenfassung
This paper concludes a special feature of Sustainability Science that explores a broad range of social value theoretical traditions, such as religious studies, social psychology, indigenous knowledge, economics, sociology, and philosophy. We introduce a novel transdisciplinary conceptual framework that revolves around concepts of ‘lenses’ and ‘tensions’ to help navigate value diversity. First, we consider the notion of lenses: perspectives on value and valuation along diverse dimensions that describe what values focus on, how their sociality is envisioned, and what epistemic and procedural assumptions are made. We characterise fourteen of such dimensions. This provides a foundation for exploration of seven areas of tension, between: (1) the values of individuals vs collectives; (2) values as discrete and held vs embedded and constructed; (3) value as static or changeable; (4) valuation as descriptive vs normative and transformative; (5) social vs relational values; (6) different rationalities and their relation to value integration; (7) degrees of acknowledgment of the role of power in navigating value conflicts. In doing so, we embrace the ‘mess’ of diversity, yet also provide a framework to organise this mess and support and encourage active transdisciplinary collaboration. We identify key research areas where such collaborations can be harnessed for sustainability transformation. Here it is crucial to understand how certain social value lenses are privileged over others and build capacity in decision-making for understanding and drawing on multiple value, epistemic and procedural lenses.
Zitierform
In: Sustainability Science Volume 14 / Issue 5 (2019-08-24) , S. 1439-1461 ; eissn:1862-4057Förderhinweis
This research was supported by the Valuing Nature Programme funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under grant reference NE/M005410/1.Zitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-2024060610290,
author={Kenter, Jasper O. and Raymond, Christopher Mark and van Riper, Carena Joleen and Azzopardi, Elaine and Brear, Michelle Rhonda and Calcagni, Fulvia and Christie, Ian and Christie, Michael and Fordham, Anne and Gould, Rachelle K. and Ives, Christopher D. and Hejnowicz, Adam Peter and Gunton, Richard and Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana and Kendal, Dave and Kronenberg, Jakub and Massenberg, Julian Richard and O’Connor, Seb and Ravenscroft, Neil and Rawluk, Andrea and Raymond, Ivan J. and Rodríguez‑Morales, Jorge and Thankappan, Samarthia},
title={Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability},
journal={Sustainability Science},
year={2019}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2019$n2019 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15843 3000 Kenter, Jasper O. 3010 Raymond, Christopher Mark 3010 van Riper, Carena Joleen 3010 Azzopardi, Elaine 3010 Brear, Michelle Rhonda 3010 Calcagni, Fulvia 3010 Christie, Ian 3010 Christie, Michael 3010 Fordham, Anne 3010 Gould, Rachelle K. 3010 Ives, Christopher D. 3010 Hejnowicz, Adam Peter 3010 Gunton, Richard 3010 Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana 3010 Kendal, Dave 3010 Kronenberg, Jakub 3010 Massenberg, Julian Richard 3010 O’Connor, Seb 3010 Ravenscroft, Neil 3010 Rawluk, Andrea 3010 Raymond, Ivan J. 3010 Rodríguez‑Morales, Jorge 3010 Thankappan, Samarthia 4000 Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability / Kenter, Jasper O. 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15843=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Grundwerte}} 5550 {{Umwelt}} 5550 {{Erkenntnistheorie}} 5550 {{Interdisziplinarität}} 5550 {{Ökosystemdienstleistung}} 5550 {{Nachhaltigkeit}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15843
2024-06-14T08:26:13Z 2024-06-14T08:26:13Z 2019-08-24 doi:10.17170/kobra-2024060610290 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15843 This research was supported by the Valuing Nature Programme funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under grant reference NE/M005410/1. eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ shared values relational values environmental values knowledge brokering epistemology interdisciplinarity ecosystem services nature’s contributions to people 300 Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability Aufsatz This paper concludes a special feature of Sustainability Science that explores a broad range of social value theoretical traditions, such as religious studies, social psychology, indigenous knowledge, economics, sociology, and philosophy. We introduce a novel transdisciplinary conceptual framework that revolves around concepts of ‘lenses’ and ‘tensions’ to help navigate value diversity. First, we consider the notion of lenses: perspectives on value and valuation along diverse dimensions that describe what values focus on, how their sociality is envisioned, and what epistemic and procedural assumptions are made. We characterise fourteen of such dimensions. This provides a foundation for exploration of seven areas of tension, between: (1) the values of individuals vs collectives; (2) values as discrete and held vs embedded and constructed; (3) value as static or changeable; (4) valuation as descriptive vs normative and transformative; (5) social vs relational values; (6) different rationalities and their relation to value integration; (7) degrees of acknowledgment of the role of power in navigating value conflicts. In doing so, we embrace the ‘mess’ of diversity, yet also provide a framework to organise this mess and support and encourage active transdisciplinary collaboration. We identify key research areas where such collaborations can be harnessed for sustainability transformation. Here it is crucial to understand how certain social value lenses are privileged over others and build capacity in decision-making for understanding and drawing on multiple value, epistemic and procedural lenses. open access Kenter, Jasper O. Raymond, Christopher Mark van Riper, Carena Joleen Azzopardi, Elaine Brear, Michelle Rhonda Calcagni, Fulvia Christie, Ian Christie, Michael Fordham, Anne Gould, Rachelle K. Ives, Christopher D. Hejnowicz, Adam Peter Gunton, Richard Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana Kendal, Dave Kronenberg, Jakub Massenberg, Julian Richard O’Connor, Seb Ravenscroft, Neil Rawluk, Andrea Raymond, Ivan J. Rodríguez‑Morales, Jorge Thankappan, Samarthia doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00726-4 grant reference NE/M005410/1 Grundwerte Umwelt Erkenntnistheorie Interdisziplinarität Ökosystemdienstleistung Nachhaltigkeit publishedVersion eissn:1862-4057 Issue 5 Sustainability Science 1439-1461 Volume 14 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: