Datum
2022-03-18Autor
Raymond, Christopher MarkCebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.Andersson, ErikAndrade, RileyBattioni Romanelli, BarbaraFilyushkina, AnnaGoodson, Devin J.Horcea-Milcu, Andra-IoanaKeller, RoseKuiper, Jan J.Lo, VeronicaLópez-Rodríguez, María D.March, HugMetzger, MarcPlieninger, TobiasOteros-Rozas, ElisaSalcido, EvanSellberg, MyStewart, WilliamRuiz-Mallén, Isabelvan Riper, Carena J.Verburg, Peter H.Arroyo Schnell, AlbertoJohnson, Dana N.Wiedermann, Magdalena M.Schlagwort
500 Naturwissenschaften 570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie NaturschutzBiodiversitätPluralismusÖkosystemdienstleistungMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects
Zusammenfassung
The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.
Zitierform
In: One Earth Volume 5 / Issue 3 (2022-03-18) , S. 252-264 ; eissn:2590-3322Zitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-2024072410572,
author={Raymond, Christopher Mark and Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A. and Andersson, Erik and Andrade, Riley and Battioni Romanelli, Barbara and Filyushkina, Anna and Goodson, Devin J. and Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana and Keller, Rose and Kuiper, Jan J. and Lo, Veronica and López-Rodríguez, María D. and March, Hug and Metzger, Marc and Plieninger, Tobias and Oteros-Rozas, Elisa and Salcido, Evan and Sellberg, My and Stewart, William and Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel and van Riper, Carena J. and Verburg, Peter H. and Arroyo Schnell, Alberto and Johnson, Dana N. and Wiedermann, Magdalena M.},
title={Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects},
journal={One Earth},
year={2022}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2022$n2022 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15934 3000 Raymond, Christopher Mark 3010 Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A. 3010 Andersson, Erik 3010 Andrade, Riley 3010 Battioni Romanelli, Barbara 3010 Filyushkina, Anna 3010 Goodson, Devin J. 3010 Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana 3010 Keller, Rose 3010 Kuiper, Jan J. 3010 Lo, Veronica 3010 López-Rodríguez, María D. 3010 March, Hug 3010 Metzger, Marc 3010 Plieninger, Tobias 3010 Oteros-Rozas, Elisa 3010 Salcido, Evan 3010 Sellberg, My 3010 Stewart, William 3010 Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel 3010 van Riper, Carena J. 3010 Verburg, Peter H. 3010 Arroyo Schnell, Alberto 3010 Johnson, Dana N. 3010 Wiedermann, Magdalena M. 4000 Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects / Raymond, Christopher Mark 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15934=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Naturschutz}} 5550 {{Biodiversität}} 5550 {{Pluralismus}} 5550 {{Ökosystemdienstleistung}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15934
2024-07-24T08:39:08Z 2024-07-24T08:39:08Z 2022-03-18 doi:10.17170/kobra-2024072410572 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15934 eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ inclusive conservation biodiversity conservation equity plural valuation values ecosystem services protected area management 500 570 Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects Aufsatz The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets. open access Raymond, Christopher Mark Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A. Andersson, Erik Andrade, Riley Battioni Romanelli, Barbara Filyushkina, Anna Goodson, Devin J. Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana Keller, Rose Kuiper, Jan J. Lo, Veronica López-Rodríguez, María D. March, Hug Metzger, Marc Plieninger, Tobias Oteros-Rozas, Elisa Salcido, Evan Sellberg, My Stewart, William Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel van Riper, Carena J. Verburg, Peter H. Arroyo Schnell, Alberto Johnson, Dana N. Wiedermann, Magdalena M. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008 Naturschutz Biodiversität Pluralismus Ökosystemdienstleistung publishedVersion eissn:2590-3322 Issue 3 One Earth 252-264 Volume 5 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden: