The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach

Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana; Zaman, Sara; Filyushkina, Anna; López-Rodríguez, Maria D.; Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.; Raymond, Christopher Mark

dc.date.accessioned	2024-09-11T08:28:19Z
dc.date.available	2024-09-11T08:28:19Z
dc.date.issued	2022-08-18
dc.identifier	doi:10.17170/kobra-2024082310712
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16032
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.rights	Namensnennung 4.0 International	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject	human values	eng
dc.subject	experiential knowledge	eng
dc.subject	consensus	eng
dc.subject	reflexivity	eng
dc.subject	soft systems thinking	eng
dc.subject	inclusivity	eng
dc.subject.ddc	300
dc.title	The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach	eng
dc.type	Aufsatz
dcterms.abstract	Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes during a guided visioning exercise in the context of the multifunctional landscapes of Östergötland, Sweden. We investigated these cognitive processes using 30 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires organized around three types of relationships: vision ⇔ values, vision ⇔ knowledge, and especially values ⇔ knowledge. The analysis of the relationship between vision and values reveals that all types of values including core human values, relational, and intrinsic values are important in shaping the decision-making context in which landscape management visions arise. The relationship between vision and knowledge uncovers the mix of experiential and theoretical knowledge that informs the decision-making context. Interviews unfold three modalities in terms of how values and knowledge relate: i) linked and not necessarily connected (e.g. when individuals perceive a high conflict between their knowledge and their values leading to one construct silencing the other); ii) mutually reinforcing (e.g. when values and knowledge are seen as feeding into one another); and iii) intertwined (e.g. when individuals perceive that values and knowledge can co-exist). We discuss our findings in the context of their relevance for a collaborative decision-making process for balancing consensus and dissensus in multifunctional landscapes.	eng
dcterms.accessRights	open access
dcterms.creator	Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana
dcterms.creator	Zaman, Sara
dcterms.creator	Filyushkina, Anna
dcterms.creator	López-Rodríguez, Maria D.
dcterms.creator	Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.
dcterms.creator	Raymond, Christopher Mark
dc.relation.doi	doi:10.1080/26395916.2022.2108498
dc.relation.projectid	grant number 2018-02429, grant number 2018-00175
dc.subject.swd	Wert	ger
dc.subject.swd	Erfahrungswissen	ger
dc.subject.swd	Konsens	ger
dc.subject.swd	Reflexivität	ger
dc.subject.swd	Systemdenken	ger
dc.subject.swd	Inklusion <Soziologie>	ger
dc.subject.swd	Wissen	ger
dc.type.version	publishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifier	eissn:2639-5916
dcterms.source.issue	Issue 1
dcterms.source.journal	Ecosystems and People	eng
dcterms.source.pageinfo	498-513
dcterms.source.volume	Volume 18
kup.iskup	false