Date
2022-08-18Author
Horcea-Milcu, Andra-IoanaZaman, SaraFilyushkina, AnnaLópez-Rodríguez, Maria D.Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.Raymond, Christopher MarkSubject
300 Social sciences WertErfahrungswissenKonsensReflexivitätSystemdenkenInklusion <Soziologie>WissenMetadata
Show full item record
Aufsatz![](/themes/Mirage2/images/Open_Access_logo_PLoS_transparent.svg)
The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach
Abstract
Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes during a guided visioning exercise in the context of the multifunctional landscapes of Östergötland, Sweden. We investigated these cognitive processes using 30 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires organized around three types of relationships: vision ⇔ values, vision ⇔ knowledge, and especially values ⇔ knowledge. The analysis of the relationship between vision and values reveals that all types of values including core human values, relational, and intrinsic values are important in shaping the decision-making context in which landscape management visions arise. The relationship between vision and knowledge uncovers the mix of experiential and theoretical knowledge that informs the decision-making context. Interviews unfold three modalities in terms of how values and knowledge relate: i) linked and not necessarily connected (e.g. when individuals perceive a high conflict between their knowledge and their values leading to one construct silencing the other); ii) mutually reinforcing (e.g. when values and knowledge are seen as feeding into one another); and iii) intertwined (e.g. when individuals perceive that values and knowledge can co-exist). We discuss our findings in the context of their relevance for a collaborative decision-making process for balancing consensus and dissensus in multifunctional landscapes.
Citation
In: Ecosystems and People Volume 18 / Issue 1 (2022-08-18) , S. 498-513 ; eissn:2639-5916Citation
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-2024082310712,
author={Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana and Zaman, Sara and Filyushkina, Anna and López-Rodríguez, Maria D. and Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A. and Raymond, Christopher Mark},
title={The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach},
journal={Ecosystems and People},
year={2022}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2022$n2022 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16032 3000 Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana 3010 Zaman, Sara 3010 Filyushkina, Anna 3010 López-Rodríguez, Maria D. 3010 Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A. 3010 Raymond, Christopher Mark 4000 The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach / Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16032=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Wert}} 5550 {{Erfahrungswissen}} 5550 {{Konsens}} 5550 {{Reflexivität}} 5550 {{Systemdenken}} 5550 {{Inklusion <Soziologie>}} 5550 {{Wissen}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16032
2024-09-11T08:28:19Z 2024-09-11T08:28:19Z 2022-08-18 doi:10.17170/kobra-2024082310712 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16032 eng Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ human values experiential knowledge consensus reflexivity soft systems thinking inclusivity 300 The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach Aufsatz Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes during a guided visioning exercise in the context of the multifunctional landscapes of Östergötland, Sweden. We investigated these cognitive processes using 30 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires organized around three types of relationships: vision ⇔ values, vision ⇔ knowledge, and especially values ⇔ knowledge. The analysis of the relationship between vision and values reveals that all types of values including core human values, relational, and intrinsic values are important in shaping the decision-making context in which landscape management visions arise. The relationship between vision and knowledge uncovers the mix of experiential and theoretical knowledge that informs the decision-making context. Interviews unfold three modalities in terms of how values and knowledge relate: i) linked and not necessarily connected (e.g. when individuals perceive a high conflict between their knowledge and their values leading to one construct silencing the other); ii) mutually reinforcing (e.g. when values and knowledge are seen as feeding into one another); and iii) intertwined (e.g. when individuals perceive that values and knowledge can co-exist). We discuss our findings in the context of their relevance for a collaborative decision-making process for balancing consensus and dissensus in multifunctional landscapes. open access Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana Zaman, Sara Filyushkina, Anna López-Rodríguez, Maria D. Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A. Raymond, Christopher Mark doi:10.1080/26395916.2022.2108498 grant number 2018-02429, grant number 2018-00175 Wert Erfahrungswissen Konsens Reflexivität Systemdenken Inklusion <Soziologie> Wissen publishedVersion eissn:2639-5916 Issue 1 Ecosystems and People 498-513 Volume 18 false
The following license files are associated with this item: